2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cretaceous sea-surface temperature evolution: Constraints from TEX86 and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
234
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 230 publications
23
234
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also carry out the same process using a combined 18 O and TEX 86 data set (supporting information Figure S11), using TEX 86 estimates compiled in O'Brien et al (2017;their Figure 9b), Inglis et al (2015), and Cramwinckel et al (2018), using a linear calibration (supporting information Figures S11a-S11c) and an exponential calibration (supporting information Figures S11c and S11d). This results in inferred temperatures with more variation across different sites than those from solely 18 O, and in particular several sites give very warm inferred temperatures during the Eocene, especially those from the southwest Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean (e.g., ODP Site 1172, Hampden Beach, IODP Site 1356).…”
Section: Model Evaluation: Inference Of Global Mean Temperature From mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also carry out the same process using a combined 18 O and TEX 86 data set (supporting information Figure S11), using TEX 86 estimates compiled in O'Brien et al (2017;their Figure 9b), Inglis et al (2015), and Cramwinckel et al (2018), using a linear calibration (supporting information Figures S11a-S11c) and an exponential calibration (supporting information Figures S11c and S11d). This results in inferred temperatures with more variation across different sites than those from solely 18 O, and in particular several sites give very warm inferred temperatures during the Eocene, especially those from the southwest Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean (e.g., ODP Site 1172, Hampden Beach, IODP Site 1356).…”
Section: Model Evaluation: Inference Of Global Mean Temperature From mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cretaceous Period (~145–66 Ma) was characterized by a greenhouse climate (Hay, , and references therein), with elevated atmospheric CO 2 levels (e.g., Foster et al, ; Naafs et al, ), high sea surface temperatures (e.g., Bice et al, ; Naafs & Pancost, ; O'Brien et al, ; Schouten et al, ), and little or no continental ice (Huber et al, ; MacLeod et al, ). Superimposed on this general greenhouse climate are the oceanic anoxic events (OAEs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleoclimate reconstructions, however, can be used to assess the sensitivity of the Earth's climate system to changes of different forcing parameters (e.g., CO 2 ) and to test the reliability of climate models by evaluating their simulations for conditions very different from the modern climate. In this context, not only high-resolution studies of the most recent (Holocene) climate history are of importance but also detailed studies of the earlier Earth history characterized by a much warmer (Greenhouse-type) global climate with elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, such as the Late Cretaceous and the Paleogene (Hong & Lee, 2012;Kent & Muttoni, 2013;O'Brien et al, 2017;Zachos et al, 2008). A precise knowledge of rates and scales of past climate change are the only mode to separate natural and anthropogenic forcings and will enable us to further increase the reliability of climate change predictions.…”
Section: Recent Arctic Climate Change Future Predictions and Paleormentioning
confidence: 99%