2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101834
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cretaceous Blind Snake from Brazil Fills Major Gap in Snake Evolution

Abstract: Summary Blind snakes (Scolecophidia) are minute cryptic snakes that diverged at the base of the evolutionary radiation of modern snakes. They have a scant fossil record, which dates back to the Upper Paleocene-Lower Eocene (∼56 Ma); this late appearance conflicts with molecular evidence, which suggests a much older origin for the group (during the Mesozoic: 160–125 Ma). Here we report a typhlopoid blind snake from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil, Boipeba tayasuensis gen. et sp. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest reported fossils of the group were until recently restricted to the Paleogene with records reported from the Paleocene in Europe (Folie, 2007), Paleocene-Eocene boundary in north Africa (Augé & Rage, 2006), and possibly the Paleocene (Schiebout, Rigsby, Rapp, Hartnell, & Standhardt, 1987) and certainly the Oligocene (Mead, 2013) in North America. A recent report of a large-bodied scolecophidian, Boipeba tayasuensis, from the Cretaceous of Brazil pushes the material record of scolecophidians back into the late Mesozoic and suggests that the relatively small body size of extant scolecophidians is a derived condition (Fachini et al, 2020). This new record is consistent with recent genomic-scale data, which estimate the node containing Typhlopoidea, Anomalepididae, and Alethinophidia in the Cretaceous (Burbrink et al, 2020).…”
Section: Commentarysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The earliest reported fossils of the group were until recently restricted to the Paleogene with records reported from the Paleocene in Europe (Folie, 2007), Paleocene-Eocene boundary in north Africa (Augé & Rage, 2006), and possibly the Paleocene (Schiebout, Rigsby, Rapp, Hartnell, & Standhardt, 1987) and certainly the Oligocene (Mead, 2013) in North America. A recent report of a large-bodied scolecophidian, Boipeba tayasuensis, from the Cretaceous of Brazil pushes the material record of scolecophidians back into the late Mesozoic and suggests that the relatively small body size of extant scolecophidians is a derived condition (Fachini et al, 2020). This new record is consistent with recent genomic-scale data, which estimate the node containing Typhlopoidea, Anomalepididae, and Alethinophidia in the Cretaceous (Burbrink et al, 2020).…”
Section: Commentarysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Parviraptor ,” including but not limited to the late Bathonian or earliest Callovian Eophis , the Kimmeridgian Diablophis and Portugalophis , and Parviraptor itself from around the Jurassic/Cretaceous (Tithonian/Berriasian) boundary. Traditionally regarded as representing the oldest anguimorphs, these fossils would calibrate Node 130, the split between Pan-Iguania [PN] and Anguimorpha; however, phylogenetic analyses following a redescription of much of the material have found it to constitute the oldest known pan-serpents, thus calibrating Node 129 ( Caldwell et al, 2015 ; Martill et al, 2015 ; by implication Conrad, 2017 ; accepted without analysis by Garberoglio et al, 2019 ; Simões et al, 2020 ; Schineider Fachini et al, 2020 ). As the Bathonian began 168.3 ± 1.3 Ma ago and ended 166.1 ± 1.2 Ma ago, i.e., with uncertainty ranges that overlap in the middle (ICSC), the suggestion of 167 Ma by Caldwell et al (2015) would then be a reasonable minimum age for this calibration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blindsnakes, threadsnakes, and wormsnakes (traditionally known as "Scolecophidia") are of small size (mostly), fossorial and have extremely modified baupläne, which diverged at the base of the evolutionary radiation of modern snakes (Fachini et al, 2020;Greene, 1997;Vidal et al, 2010). Even though all living lineages, mainly from Anomalepididae and Leptotyphlopidae are small-sizedwith an adult maximum size ranging from 106 mm (Tetracheilostoma carlae; Adalsteinsson et al, 2009) to 460 mm (Rhinoleptus koniagui; Adalsteinsson et al, 2009)-recent fossil discoveries indicate that scolecophidians exhibited large sizes (1 m) in the Mesozoic and only later underwent an extreme body size reduction (Fachini et al, 2020). Such an extreme evolutionary size reduction-possibly due to miniaturization-most likely occurred independently in each of the main lineages (i.e., Anomalepididae, Leptotyphlopidae, and Typhlopoidea; Fachini et al, 2020).…”
Section: Miniaturization and Its Possible Relation With The Distinct Morphology Of Mitophis And Tetracheilostomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precloacal, cloacal, and caudal vertebrae are very conserved among "scolecophidians" (Fachini et al, 2020;Holman, 2000;List, 1966) in such a way that they are all dorsoventrally flattened, bear synapophyses with a single articular facet, lack a neural spine, and exhibit a rounded cotyle and condyle (Holman, 2000;Koch et al, 2019;List, 1966;Martins, Koch, et al, 2019;Pinto et al, 2015).…”
Section: Structural Simplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation