Crestal Bone Remodeling Around Implants Placed Using a Short Drilling Protocol

Bratu, Elisabeta; Mihali, Sorin Gheorghe; Shapira, Lior; Bratu, Dana Cristina; Wang, Hom Lay

doi:10.11607/jomi.3526

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bratu et al and Mihali et al suggested the use of a short drilling implant protocol (sdip) during implant osteotomy preparations, supporting the significantly reduced duration [ 56 , 57 ]. The sdip consisted only of the use of the pilot drill and the final drill.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compared to the conventional protocol, the sdip did not show any statistically significant difference in temperature increase and drilling torque [ 56 ]. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference on bone remodeling between the conventional and sdip 12 months after epicrestal implant placement, both showing around 1 mm of crestal bone loss [ 57 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae Comparing MIS® Straight Drills with Densah® Burs

Σολδάτος

Pham

Fakhouri

et al. 2022

Genes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: Several studies showed a sustained temperature of 47 °C or 50 °C for one minute resulted in vascular stasis and bone resorption with only limited bone regrowth over a 3–4-week healing period. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the temperature changes (ΔΤ) that occur during the preparation of dental implant osteotomies using MIS® straight drills versus Densah® burs in a clockwise (cutting) drilling protocol. (2) Methods: Two hundred (240) osteotomies of two different systems’ drills were prepared at 6 mm depth at 800, 1000, and 1200 revolutions per minute (RPM), in fresh, unembalmed tibiae, obtained by a female cadaver. ΔΤ was calculated by subtracting the baseline temperature on the tibial surface, from the maximum temperature-inside the osteotomy (ΔT = Tmax − Tbase). The variables were evaluated both for their individual and for their synergistic effect on ΔΤ with the use of one-, two-, three- and four-way interactions; (3) Results: An independent and a three-way interaction (drill design, drill width, and RPM) was found in all three RPM for the Densah® burs and at 1000 RPM for the MIS® straight drills. As Densah® burs diameter increased, ΔΤ decreased. The aforementioned pattern was seen only at 1000 RPM for the MIS® straight drills. The usage of drills 20 times more than the implant manufacturers’ recommendation did not significantly affect the ΔΤ. A stereoscopic examination of the specimens confirmed the findings. (4) Conclusions: The independent and synergistic effect of drills’ diameter, design and RPM had a significant effect on ΔΤ in human tibiae, which never exceeded the critical threshold of 47 °C.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae Comparing MIS® Straight Drills with Densah® Burs

Σολδάτος

Pham

Fakhouri

et al. 2022

Genes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several publications suggested that, reducing the number of drill steps is not compromising clinical results (22)(23)(24). Limiting the duration of surgical intervention to better healing and more patient satisfaction (25). According to Nadine Marheineke et al in 2018 (26), higher accuracy of implant preparations were generated by single step drill protocols, which might result in an increased primary stability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Success of Single Drilling Implant System (Clinical and Radiographic Study)

Senada

Sheikh

Khalil

2020

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION: Preparation of the implant osteotomy has been classically performed using drills of various shapes to conform the site to the implant's geometry. Drilling procedures may cause not only mechanical trauma to the bone but also heat-induced bone necrosis, thus representing a significant risk for failed osseointegration. As an alternative single drilling osteotomy is a technique that allows effective bone cutting with minimally traumatic procedures and less heat generation. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of single drilling implant site preparation in affecting implant stability and crestal bone loss that takes place around the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on thirteen patients having missing posterior mandibular teeth indicated for implant restoration. All implants were placed using single drilling osteotomy. After 3 months, final crowns were delivered. All implants were followed for 6 months. Clinically, each patient was evaluated for pain, swelling and stability of the implant. Radiographically, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used for the assessment of marginal bone level and bone density. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in bone density from immediate postoperative to the end of the 6 months. The mean of marginal bone level from immediately post-operative to the 3rd month was significant and from immediate to 6th month was significant. One case displayed swelling in the first week and the implant was removed (failure case) due to lack of oral hygiene maintenance by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Single drilling osteotomy was a successful treatment procedure, with satisfactory clinical outcomes, and a low incidence of complications.

show abstract

“…Patients were sent for Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans to evaluate bone dimension and implant positioning. A short drilling protocol was used and four to ten dental implants were placed in the edentulous arches followed by a 3-month period of osseointegration [10]. All the restoration bring multi-unit abutment at the day of insertion and a temporary full-arch restoration was made not more than 48 hours ( fig.…”

Section: Clinical and Laboratory Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Outcomes in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Utilizing Pressed Composite Restorations

Mihali¹,

Bratu²

2017

Mat.Plast.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The author wants to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of the composite pressed on metal framework for full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in comparing with dental ceramic restorations. A total of thirty-two edentulous arches were restored. All complications were recorded at each follow-up visit up to 1 year after insertion. No complications were reported on pressed composite restoration. Complications were found in the ceramic restorations like chipping or fracture of the ceramic veneer. The composite pressed restorations are a treatment option for full arch restorations over implants, showing a better success rate in the present study in comparing with ceramic restorations.

show abstract

Crestal Bone Remodeling Around Implants Placed Using a Short Drilling Protocol

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae Comparing MIS® Straight Drills with Densah® Burs

Temperature Changes during Implant Osteotomy Preparations in Human Cadaver Tibiae Comparing MIS® Straight Drills with Densah® Burs

Evaluation of Success of Single Drilling Implant System (Clinical and Radiographic Study)

Clinical Outcomes in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Utilizing Pressed Composite Restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About