Crestal bone loss proximal to oral implants in older and younger adults

Bryant, S. Ross; Zarb, George A.

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00199-9

Cited by 85 publications

(92 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The data reported for other implant systems is in the range from 1.0 to 2.5 mm. 3,6,12 The LL surfaced implant is superior in this important measure to consecutive controls and literature reports on other implant systems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…3,6,12 At 3 years postoperative the Silhouette implant with LL surface treatment enables the reduction of crestal bone loss to 0.59 mm. It is hypothesized that this has been accomplished by reducing the stress in the crestal bone through a combination of implant design and surface modification 13 and effecting soft-tissue attachment above the bone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Evaluation of Laser Microtexturing for Soft Tissue and Bone Attachment to Dental Implants

Pecora¹,

Ceccarelli²,

Bonelli³

et al. 2009

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Evaluation of Laser Microtexturing for Soft Tissue and Bone Attachment to Dental Implants

Pecora¹,

Ceccarelli²,

Bonelli³

et al. 2009

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…When comparing crestal bone loss around implants in younger and older patients, no significant differences were noted by Bryant and Zarb in their study [32]. Also, to prevent peri-implantitis, screw retained restorations must be preferred over cement retained ones to avoid remnants of excess cement in the soft tissues.…”

Section: Periodontal Therapy and Implant Prosthodonticsmentioning

confidence: 84%

Gerodontology: An Interdisciplinary Approach

Jha¹,

Patankar²,

Singhal³

et al. 2017

Periodon Prosthodon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review is to throw light on the interrelationship between periodontics, restorative dentistry and prosthodontics in geriatric population. Increased life expectancy along with appropriate dental treatment in the younger ages leads to retention of more number of teeth in the advanced ages. To maintain these teeth disease free and in function in the older individuals is a multi-faceted challenge. This article describes the various restorative and prosthodontic treatment modalities that are commonly used in the dental rehabilitation of geriatric patients and their relationship with the periodontium and gingival health.

show abstract

“…In previous studies, the relationship between age and bone loss was also not detected [23][24][25]. Even though some other studies found out correlation between age and peri-implant bone resorption parameters, but such were noted only at the age after 70 years and among individuals with compromised somatic status [26].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Reduction Levels from Superimposition Perspective: Pilot Study among Ukrainian Implantology Practice

Goncharuk-Khomyn

Keniuk

2018

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the possibility and efficiency of using adapted peri-implant bone evaluation method based on the principle of graphical superimposition and compare it to the possibilities of using sagittal sections of CBCT results to register the dynamics of peri-implant bone changes during the first year of implant functioning. Material and Methods: 108 pairs of DICOM data sets were selected and pre-anonymized and coded in Planmeca Romexis ® Viewer software. Each pair of datasets consisted of a CBCT file, obtained immediately after the installation of a dental implant, and one year after its operation. The first method of peri-implant bone changes evaluation was carried out by analyzing the sagittal sections of the CBCT data from the mesial and distal sides of the implant. The second method was followed by original algorithm, which included specific steps of superimposition of graphical images. Results: Superimposition method helped to establish volumetric parameter of circular bone reduction around dental implants after 1 year of their functioning. Such average values for the maxillary distal implants were 3.547 mm3, maxillary frontal implants -3.118 mm3, mandibular distal implants -2.614 mm3, mandibular frontal implants -2.456 mm 3. Correlation values between averages of vertical bone loss parameters and volumetric bone loss parameters riches r=0.954. Among all patients the highest peri-implant bone reduction rates were observed in the distal and frontal areas of the maxilla, even though statistical difference among such parameters of implants installed at the areas of mandible and maxilla was not significant (p > 0.05). Such observation was established during the analysis of results obtained both by digital sagittal cross section from CBCT results and by superimposition method. Conclusion: Using the superimposition principle allows us to evaluate the individual indicator of volumetric bone loss at the peri-implant region. The possibility of taking into account the parameters of bone tissue volume reduction, instead of just geometrical parameter of bone height, allows to individualize the parameters of bone loss among patients of different prosthetic rehabilitation group.

show abstract

Crestal bone loss proximal to oral implants in older and younger adults

Cited by 85 publications

References 10 publications

Clinical Evaluation of Laser Microtexturing for Soft Tissue and Bone Attachment to Dental Implants

Clinical Evaluation of Laser Microtexturing for Soft Tissue and Bone Attachment to Dental Implants

Gerodontology: An Interdisciplinary Approach

Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Reduction Levels from Superimposition Perspective: Pilot Study among Ukrainian Implantology Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About