Crescimento e desenvolvimento a longo prazo do prematuro extremo

Rugolo, Lígia Maria Suppo de Souza

doi:10.1590/s0021-75572005000200013

Cited by 126 publications

(192 citation statements)

References 52 publications

(86 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

139

Order By: Relevance

“…[3][4][5][6] Infants born prematurely present developmental abnormalities with greater frequency than those born at full term. [7][8][9] Preterms may suffer from failure to thrive in terms of both height and weight, from motor development disorders, mental deficiencies, hearing loss, impaired vision, language difficulties, cardiovascular problems, respiratory problems, attention deficits and hyperactivity, among other problems. 3,10 The protocol used for follow-up of patients who have spent time in neonatal intensive care units includes a motor development evaluation and countless tools have been used to help professionals working in the area make more precise functional assessments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validade concorrente e confiabilidade da Alberta Infant Motor Scale em lactentes nascidos prematuros

Almeida¹,

Dutra²,

Mello³

et al. 2008

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To verify the concurrent validity and interobserver reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) in premature infants followed-up at the outpatient clinic of Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IFF/ Fiocruz), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. infants between 0 and 18 months were assessed using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale, by two different observers and the results analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Methods Results:The concurrent validity study found a high level of correlation between the two scales (r = 0.95) and one that was statistically significant (p < 0.01) for the entire population of infants, with higher values at 12 months (r = 0.89) than at 6 months (r = 0.74). The interobserver reliability study found satisfactory intraclass correlation coefficients at all ages tested, varying from 0.76 to 0.99. Conclusions:The AIMS is a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of motor development in high-risk infants within the Brazilian public health system. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(5):442-448: Prematurity, child development, assessment, Alberta Infant Motor Scale, validity and reliability.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validade concorrente e confiabilidade da Alberta Infant Motor Scale em lactentes nascidos prematuros

Almeida¹,

Dutra²,

Mello³

et al. 2008

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Os avanços na área da Neonatologia tem promovido um aumento na sobrevivência de recém-nascidos com idade gestacional e peso de nascimento menores (Rugolo, 2005). Entretanto, os bebês que nascem prematuros (PT) (antes de 37 semanas de gestação) e com baixo peso (BP) (<2.500g) são mais vulneráveis a doenças e complicações, como enfermidades crônicas (broncodisplasia, síndrome do estresse respiratório, hemorragia intraventricular, retinopatia ou anemia da prematuridade, problemas cardiovasculares, dentre outros) e hospitalizações repetidas e/ou prolongadas (Bordin, Linhares & Jorge, 2001;Klebanov & Brooks-Gunn, 2006;Linhares, Chimello, Bordin, Carvalho & Martinez, 2005).…”

unclassified

Indicadores cognitivos, lingüísticos, comportamentais e acadêmicos de pré-escolares nascidos pré-termo e a termo

Oliveira

Enumo

Queiroz

et al. 2011

Psic.: Teor. e Pesq.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO -Este estudo comparou o desenvolvimento de crianças, aos cinco anos de idade, nascidas prematuras e com baixo peso (PTBP), com crianças nascidas a termo (AT), avaliando-se indicadores acadêmicos (IAR), comportamentais (CBCL-1½-5 anos), linguísticos (LAVE-expressiva; TVIP-receptiva) e cognitivos (testes psicométricos: Columbia e Raven-MPC; prova assistida: CATM). A amostra foi composta por 34 crianças distribuídas em dois grupos: G1-PTBP: 17 crianças pré-termo (<37 semanas de gestação) e baixo peso; e G2-AT: 17 crianças a termo e peso ≥2.500g. G1-PTBP apresentou desempenho inferior nas áreas acadêmica, lingüística expressiva, comportamental e cognitiva (Columbia e CATM: operações cognitivas e comportamentos facilitadores). Confirmaram-se outros estudos indicativos de que crianças PTBP podem apresentar mais problemas no curso de seu desenvolvimento do que crianças nascidas a termo.Palavras-chaves: prematuridade; desempenho cognitivo; fatores de risco ao desenvolvimento. Cognitive, Linguistic, Behavioral and Academic Indicators of Preterm and Full Term Born Preschool ChildrenABSTRACT -This study compared the development of 5 years old premature and low weight born children, with full term born children of the same age. The following indicators were evaluated: academic (IAR), behavioral (CBCL-1½-5 years), language (LAVE-expressive, TVIP-receptive) and cognitive (Columbia, Raven-MPC and CATM). The sample consisted of 34 children: 17 premature and low weight born children (<37 weeks' gestation), and 17 full-term born children who weighed ≥2.500g as newborns. The premature children showed a lower performance on academic, expressive language, behavioral and cognitive areas (Columbia and CATM: cognitive operations and facilitating behaviors). The study confirmed other studies indicating that premature children can present more problems in the course of their development than full term born children.

show abstract

“…Some authors advocate its use (15,16), while others believe that age correction may overstate preterm performance in comparison to those born full term at two years of age (30). D' Agostino et al (31) reported that despite the international recommendation for age adjustment in premature infants, most professionals working in primary care do not use it, and that this fact has important implications for the care, such as erroneous detection of delays and early prescriptions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%