1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-0257(95)01373-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creeping sphere motion in Herschel-Bulkley fluids: flow field and drag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
128
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
128
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The shear strength is denoted by , gravitational acceleration by g, sphere diameter by d, and  is the difference in the sphere and bulk fluid densities (Attapatu et al 1995, Chhabra 1992. Andres' (1961) analytical solution has Y=0.22.…”
Section: Static Equilibrium Of Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shear strength is denoted by , gravitational acceleration by g, sphere diameter by d, and  is the difference in the sphere and bulk fluid densities (Attapatu et al 1995, Chhabra 1992. Andres' (1961) analytical solution has Y=0.22.…”
Section: Static Equilibrium Of Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for a spherical sludge weight or densitometer, the critical gravity yield number is Y~0.04-0.08. The most probable value may be given by Attapatu et al (1995), who report that the available experimental data indicate Y~0.061. In regards to the uncertainty of the results, Attapatu et al (1995) and Chhabra (1992) suggest that methods used to determine the materials shear strength and experimental setup may contribute.…”
Section: Static Equilibrium Of Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high apparent viscosities in the nonconvective layer and the low velocities of the ball are indicative of creeping flow. The drag force on a ball traversing in a viscoplastic material in the creepingflow regime can be estimated from an experimental correlation for the ball drag coefficient, CDb (Atapattu et al 1995). By d e f e g a generalized ball Reynolds number for viscoplastic fluids, ReGb, .…”
Section: Apparent Viscosity Of the Nonconvective Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, discrepancies between experimental investigations can somewhat be explained by wall effects; it is pertinent to quantify and, if possible, eliminate the error they introduce. As an example, in later experimental studies of a settling sphere in a Herschel-Bulkley fluid [22,25], it was observed that for a rectangular test cell of square cross section, a cell width to sphere diameter ratio of 10 was sufficient to negate wall effects. This is supported by numerical flow field visualisations for Bingham fluids [11].…”
Section: Settling Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary concern of these early experimental studies was the development of an empirical formula relating the non-dimensional drag coefficient of a sphere to the Bingham fluid yield-stress. After the notion that C D was dependant upon the yield-stress and dynamic forces of the fluid acting on the particle, the modified Reynolds number, Re * , was developed [19] in order to quantify inertial, viscous and yield-stress forces concurrently, Based on the modified Reynolds number presented above, an experimental drag correlation for Bingham fluids, perhaps the most successful to date [22], was developed [21],…”
Section: Settling Spherementioning
confidence: 99%