2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7209-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep in an electrodeposited nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that creep exposure of initial state caused slight changes in the LAGBs spacing both in the gauge length and in the area near to the fracture. Similar results were observed also in other works [2,4,8,10] devoted to creep behaviour of initial state and stability of microstructure during isothermal ageing. It was reported that isothermal ageing has negligible eect on subgrain growth by contrast to subgrain signicant growth during creep exposure.…”
Section: Microstructure Observationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows that creep exposure of initial state caused slight changes in the LAGBs spacing both in the gauge length and in the area near to the fracture. Similar results were observed also in other works [2,4,8,10] devoted to creep behaviour of initial state and stability of microstructure during isothermal ageing. It was reported that isothermal ageing has negligible eect on subgrain growth by contrast to subgrain signicant growth during creep exposure.…”
Section: Microstructure Observationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…• C for 10 4 h caused the signicant reduction of creep resistance down to about 10% of initial state and an additional slight reduction of creep resistance after longer ageing for 2 × 10 4 h. Further, creep behaviour was signicantly inuenced by specimen position in the extrados and intrados parts of bends. Microstructure investigation revealed that long-term annealing has negligible eect on high-angle grain boundary spacing and misorientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[9] The deterioration is attributed to localized regions near prior austenitic grain boundaries (PAGB) being preferentially recovered through the formation of Z phase at PAGB accompanying the disappearance of one of the main strengthening factors of the finely dispersed carbonitride (MX, where M denotes metallic elements preferentially forming carbide and/or nitride, and X denotes carbon and/or nitrogen) particles, [10,11] besides the scavenging effect of solute elements of W and Mo owing to the grain boundary precipitation of Laves phase. [12,13] It is thus easy to overestimate the long-term strength of these high-strength steels. Kimura et al [14] proposed for this problem that rupture data below 50 pct of proof stress (0.5PS) at test temperatures are used in the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromium content at the level of 9% in P91 and P92 steels restricts their use up to a temperature of 580-600°C. Also, the carbon content in 9% Cr steels affects the type of existing precipitations and the form of martensite, which is described in great detail, inter alia, in [7,[9][10][11]. Higher chromium content of 12% in VM12 steel is required to ensure the oxidation and gas corrosion resistance during the operation at above 600°C [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%