2018
DOI: 10.15406/ipcse.2018.03.00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep fracture in tempered martensitic steels

Abstract: As long term laboratory creep data became available the original estimates of the allowable design stresses for creep strength enhanced ferritic steels (CSEF) were reduced. Thus, even in properly processed steel, the long term performance and creep rupture strength reported is below that originally predicted from a simple extrapolation of short term data. In addition, the typical alloy compositions for these steels specified by Codes provide reasonable strength but can steels can exhibit brittle creep behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, RA tends to recover for a longer time duration. The decrease in ductility is mainly caused by the pre-existing BN particles (Gu et al, 2014;Parker & Siefert, 2018;Abe et al, 2018). Breakdown in rupture strength of Gr.IIIa definitely occurs in the degradation region of RA, however the primary cause for the breakdown in strength should be investigated separately from BN, because the center of Gr.IIIa is positioned at a higher stress in Figure 12 than the center of the RA = 0 zone.…”
Section: Time To Rupture and Analysis Of Creep Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, RA tends to recover for a longer time duration. The decrease in ductility is mainly caused by the pre-existing BN particles (Gu et al, 2014;Parker & Siefert, 2018;Abe et al, 2018). Breakdown in rupture strength of Gr.IIIa definitely occurs in the degradation region of RA, however the primary cause for the breakdown in strength should be investigated separately from BN, because the center of Gr.IIIa is positioned at a higher stress in Figure 12 than the center of the RA = 0 zone.…”
Section: Time To Rupture and Analysis Of Creep Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the figures are omitted, a spool line for RA = 70% of T92/MJV is ~10 000 h and is not so largely dependent on temperature and that for MJU lies between those for MJP and MJT. Though the pre-existing BN particles are considered to be a major factor for the low ductility in Grade 92 (Gu et al, 2014;Parker & Siefert, 2018;Abe et al, 2018), the above mentioned facts indicate that factors other than BN affect the low ductility of Grade 92. Normalizing temperature, Hv, C and Ni contents for MJU are 1050 °C, 226, 0.10%, and 0.27%, respectively, and 1050 °C, 234, 0.092%, and 0.15% for MJV, respectively.…”
Section: Time To Rupture and Analysis Of Creep Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material selected for this work is virgin and service-exposed X20 steel supplied in the form of 34 mm thickness piping offcuts from a local power utility. The reason for the selection of X20 as a test material is because it is widely adopted in aging coal-fired power plants in South Africa [11] which allows access to aged material with an extensive history of up to 20 years of service exposure. Although X20 was superseded by X10CrMoVNb9-1 (P91) in the 1970s, [23] similarly aged materials are not easily acquirable for the latter steel.…”
Section: Materials and Specimen Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with similar studies on 11% Cr steels by Gupta et al [37] and suggests significant cavitation and cavity growth in the high damage, low stress test compared to the higher stress tests. [11] However, it should be noted that freshly nucleated cavities have diameters in the order of <1 μm [32] and so have been excluded from the current analysis. This is because both pre-existing and large creep cavities (>1 μm) in the ex-service materials have been shown to be principle contributing factors to failure at the relatively high stresses employed in this study.…”
Section: Microstructural and Hardness Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation