1993
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(93)90170-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep-fatigue crack propagation tests and the development of an analytical evaluation method for surface cracked pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fatigue failure is a critically important mode of failure in pressurized pipeline components and their welds [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Such structural failures in pipelines typically result from cyclic stresses that cause damage over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatigue failure is a critically important mode of failure in pressurized pipeline components and their welds [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Such structural failures in pipelines typically result from cyclic stresses that cause damage over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the literature in regard to the surface crack growth in pipes, experimental studies [12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26], as an indispensable and important component, have been conducted on surface cracked pipes for the purpose of understanding the mechanism of surface crack growth, calibrating and validating related numerical and analytical evaluation methods. The majority of the studies focused on numerical approaches, mostly by means of the FE method [12,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other is the PWT location, which is important for the detection and maintenance of in-service pipes, especially long-distance pipes. Recently, many researchers have focused on developing nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques for detecting PWT defects, including infrared thermography, 3) X-ray, 6) electrical potential drop, 7) ultrasonic, 8,9) magnetic flux leakage, 10) eddy current method, 11) elasticplastic finite element analysis 12) and so on. However, they can only inspect a pipe locally except for the hollow cylindrical guided wave (HCGW) of ultrasonic method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%