1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00020693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep crack growth behavior in 316 stainless steel at 594�C (1100�F)

Abstract: The creep crack growth behavior of a type 316 stainless steel was characterized at 594°C (II00°F) using precracked single edge notch specimens loaded in displacement rate control. The steady-state crack growth rate, da/dt, correlated with J-integral and did not correlate with C*. The creep crack growth behavior in this material and temperature is compared with our previous creep crack growth rate data on a Cr-Mo-V steel at 538°C (1000°F) and on type 304 stainless steel at 594°C in which da/dt correlated with C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Saxena, Ernst and Landes [21] have obtained a good correlation between ~ and J for creep crack growth in Type 316 stainless steel at 594°C. Figure 9 shows the present results for the ferritic steel tested at 400°C.…”
Section: An Attempt To Relate Crack Growth Rate To Jmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, Saxena, Ernst and Landes [21] have obtained a good correlation between ~ and J for creep crack growth in Type 316 stainless steel at 594°C. Figure 9 shows the present results for the ferritic steel tested at 400°C.…”
Section: An Attempt To Relate Crack Growth Rate To Jmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…F is the K-calibration factor, F = ( K / P ) B W 1/2. F t = dF/d(a/W), r 1 are geometric functions given in [15,16].…”
Section: Estimation Of (Ct)avg and (Da/dt)avgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have found a rather good correlation with C* in experiments for carbon steel, chromium-molybdenum steel and various stainless steels (see Taira et al [1], Ohtani [2], Jansson [3], and Riedel [4]). In experiments for stainless steel Maas and Pineau [5] also find a reasonable correlation with an experimentally measured C* at relatively high crack growth rates; but these authors as well as Saxena et al [6] caution against the use of the experimentally measured C* value, proportional to the load displacement rate, since this experimental value is not always representative of the contour integral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%