2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep and shrinkage of recycled aggregate concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
126
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
126
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a change in stress distribution of mortar and aggregates over time during the creep process, both at early and latter ages. Similar findings have been reported by other authors (2,6,69,78,89,90), who noted largely higher (up to 84%) creep strains in concrete fully made with coarse recycled aggregates than in conventional concrete, while these increments lessened to 5-26% in concrete with low replacement ratios (20-30%) ( Figure 16). …”
Section: Creepsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This leads to a change in stress distribution of mortar and aggregates over time during the creep process, both at early and latter ages. Similar findings have been reported by other authors (2,6,69,78,89,90), who noted largely higher (up to 84%) creep strains in concrete fully made with coarse recycled aggregates than in conventional concrete, while these increments lessened to 5-26% in concrete with low replacement ratios (20-30%) ( Figure 16). …”
Section: Creepsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Regarding RC with low replacement ratios (20-30%), different researches revealed that its shrinkage presents values slightly higher than those obtained in conventional concrete (increments of 3-8%) (2,10,78). When replacement get up to 50%, the shrinkage deformations in RC are 13-33% higher than those registered in conventional concretes.…”
Section: Shrinkagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations