2003
DOI: 10.1243/030932403762671854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep analysis of pressurized circumferential pipe weldments—a review

Abstract: This paper reviews work related to the high-temperature creep analysis of pressurized circumferential pipe weldments. It is important to define the problem and thus metallurgical features correctly; the identification of material microstructural-property variations within the heat-affected zone (HAZ) and the failure modes of welds are briefly included, as well as in-service experience of pipe welds. Experimental methods, including model and full-size component testing, are summarized and examples of typical te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nondestructive inspection of the Takashi HONDA*, Takuya FUKAHORI*, Toshihide IGARI*, Yasuharu CHUMAN*, Takumi TOKIYOSHI* and Alan CF COCKS** surface and subsurface of pipe welds is carried out to examine the current damage, such as the cavity density, and the results are employed to guide simulation-based predictions. Several approaches can be taken in terms of damage simulation for Type IV failure, such as: continuum mechanics together with the stress-based time fraction or the ductility fraction of the material; creep fracture mechanics using the C* parameter (Yatomi et al, 2003, Segle et al, 2000; creep cavitation mechanics assuming diffusion (Rice, 1981); use of a grain boundary-resistance model (Fukahori, et al, 2013; and/or damage mechanics (Hyde et al, 2003, Yao et al, 2007. It remains difficult, however, to determine an optimal method for expressing both the microscopic and macroscopic phenomena of actual Type IV damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nondestructive inspection of the Takashi HONDA*, Takuya FUKAHORI*, Toshihide IGARI*, Yasuharu CHUMAN*, Takumi TOKIYOSHI* and Alan CF COCKS** surface and subsurface of pipe welds is carried out to examine the current damage, such as the cavity density, and the results are employed to guide simulation-based predictions. Several approaches can be taken in terms of damage simulation for Type IV failure, such as: continuum mechanics together with the stress-based time fraction or the ductility fraction of the material; creep fracture mechanics using the C* parameter (Yatomi et al, 2003, Segle et al, 2000; creep cavitation mechanics assuming diffusion (Rice, 1981); use of a grain boundary-resistance model (Fukahori, et al, 2013; and/or damage mechanics (Hyde et al, 2003, Yao et al, 2007. It remains difficult, however, to determine an optimal method for expressing both the microscopic and macroscopic phenomena of actual Type IV damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the stresses and failure behaviour of pipe weldments under creep condition have been modelled successfully by Hyde et al [5]. Similar studies have been carried out, for a P91 steel, in order to develop a creep constitutive model with a damage capability [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to Type IV damage, such as continuum mechanics together with the stressbased time fraction or the ductility fraction of the material (3) , damage mechanics on the basis of the effective stress reflecting the damage parameter (4) , creep fracture mechanics using the C * parameter (5) - (7) , and creep void mechanics assuming diffusion (8) . There is not a method currently available, however, that can simulate both microscopic damage such as the initiation and coalescence of the cavities, and the progress of macroscopic damage such as the distribution of the cavities or the growth of the crack-like defects in the welded joints with stress distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%