2005
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhj009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit Ratings as Coordination Mechanisms

Abstract: In this paper, we provide a novel rationale for credit ratings. The rationale that we propose is that credit ratings can serve as a coordinating mechanism in situations where multiple equilibria can obtain. We show that credit ratings provide a "focal point" for firms and their investors.We explore the vital, but previously overlooked implicit contractual relationship between a credit rating agency and a firm. Credit ratings can help fix the desired equilibrium and as such play an economically meaningful role.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
176
5
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
17
176
5
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach, known as "throughthe-cycle" methodology, ensures that agencies maintain the stability of ratings and avoid rating reversals. 4 In their model, Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) show that rating agencies play an important role as a coordinating mechanism in the economy where multiple equilibria can exist. Sufi (2009) also provides evidence for the real effects of debt certification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, known as "throughthe-cycle" methodology, ensures that agencies maintain the stability of ratings and avoid rating reversals. 4 In their model, Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006) show that rating agencies play an important role as a coordinating mechanism in the economy where multiple equilibria can exist. Sufi (2009) also provides evidence for the real effects of debt certification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viability of banks in their off-balance sheet activities (e.g., writing guarantees as in underwriting and securitization) necessitates sufficient capitalization and high credit ratings (see Boot, Milbourn and Schmeits (2005) for a general analysis of the raison d'être of credit ratings).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, incorporating these considerations has an effect similar to a reduction in the accuracy of (exogenously generated) ratings. 6 Important considerations include the role of CRA reputation and moral hazard (Mathis, McAndrews, and Rochet (2009), Bar-Isaac and Shapiro (2013), Fulghieri, Strobl, and Xia (2014), Goel and Thakor (2015), Kashyap and Kovrijnykh (2015)), feedback effects and ratings as coordination devices (Boot, Milbourn, and Schmeits (2006), Manso (2013), Goldstein and Huang (2017)), and the implications of rating-contingent regulation (Opp, Opp, and Harris (2013), Josephson and Shapiro (2019)). 7 See http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/bgreen/files/RatingsWP2017.pdf.…”
Section: Related Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%