2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creatures great and small: Real-world size of animals predicts visual cortex representations beyond taxonomic category

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VT is implicated in the representation of higher-level visual and conceptual features within multi-voxel patterns (Coutanche, Solomon, & Thompson-Schill, 2016;Haxby et al, 2001), including taxonomy-and species-relevant information for animal stimuli (Connoly et al, 2012;Coutanche and Koch, 2018). We defined VT within individuals based on a procedure outlined in Coutanche and Koch (2018) in which the region is defined as extending from 20 to 70 mm posterior to the anterior commissure, incorporating the lingual, fusiform, parahippocampal and inferior temporal gyri. We defined white matter by extracting the left/right white matter regions from the Harvard-Oxford subcortical structural atlases (Frazier et al, 2005).…”
Section: Imaging Acquisition and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VT is implicated in the representation of higher-level visual and conceptual features within multi-voxel patterns (Coutanche, Solomon, & Thompson-Schill, 2016;Haxby et al, 2001), including taxonomy-and species-relevant information for animal stimuli (Connoly et al, 2012;Coutanche and Koch, 2018). We defined VT within individuals based on a procedure outlined in Coutanche and Koch (2018) in which the region is defined as extending from 20 to 70 mm posterior to the anterior commissure, incorporating the lingual, fusiform, parahippocampal and inferior temporal gyri. We defined white matter by extracting the left/right white matter regions from the Harvard-Oxford subcortical structural atlases (Frazier et al, 2005).…”
Section: Imaging Acquisition and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these evaluations are still focused on creating variability within a dataset, offering no guarantee that the network is not simply overfit to it. Moving beyond datasets, our proposed evaluation metric HMS quantifies consistency in a network's internal behavior by directly comparing against the internal behavior of one of the most generalizable vision systems in the world: the biological brain [7,14,35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ability of biological beings to generalize and adapt extends from both structure and internal behavior. Internally, the visual system processes similar objects with similar patterns of cell activations [7,14,35]. This activation behavior is an observable manifestation of the brain's ability to generalize beyond its experience, such as automatically allowing the classification of unseen instances of object classes (e.g., correctly identifying a car despite never having seen this specific car before).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another relevant study, Gabay and colleagues trained participants through extensive exposure to geometric shapes of different sizes, finding that early visual cortex activation was stronger for shapes that had previously been associated with larger sizes (Gabay et al, 2016). Finally, in a recent study of how real-world size is processed in visual cortex, Coutanche and Koch (2018) found that size was represented in early visual cortex beyond taxonomic category. By using animal species that break the typical correlation between real-world size and taxonomic category (e.g., insects that are bigger than birds, and birds that are bigger than mammals), the authors found pattern similarity based on real-world size after accounting for taxonomic and visual differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using animal species that break the typical correlation between real-world size and taxonomic category (e.g., insects that are bigger than birds, and birds that are bigger than mammals), the authors found pattern similarity based on real-world size after accounting for taxonomic and visual differences. Thus, when examining how the brain responds to visually presented items that are neither manipulable nor potential landmarks, real-world size information has been found in early visual cortex (Borghesani et al, 2016;Coutanche & Koch, 2018;Gabay et al, 2016). In some cases, this is accompanied by an absence of size information in VT cortex for these same items (Borghesani et al, 2016;Coutanche & Koch, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%