Creativity techniques to enhance knowledge transfer within global virtual teams in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises

Abstract

online septembre 2016 (pas prévu dans Issue Dec. 2016, donc surement en 2017)International audienceThis conceptual paper investigates the common concern among managers that the physical separation of workers within a global virtual team may hinder the transfer of knowledge amongst the team members that is required to carry out their work efficiently, especially in the context of knowledge-intensive enterprises. Workers and work teams in knowledge-intensive enterprises are often involved in creative tasks that are carried out jointly and involve team members with diversified competencies exchanging knowledge related to their projects and assignments to create innovative outcomes. We investigate some popular creativity-enhancing techniques in the perspective of their use as catalysts for knowledge transfer in this context. We assess whether the use of these techniques may alleviate the limitations imposed on global virtual team members by their use of telecommunications and collaborative work tools that might otherwise adversely affect the effectiveness of the knowledge transfer. These techniques are designed to be used individually, by groups or within a virtual community. The physical and temporal separation of the global virtual team members does not hinder the knowledge-intensive dimension of these enterprises when aided by creativity-stimulating techniques. Therefore, we suggest that global virtual teams making use of creativity-enhancing techniques may be more efficient in transferring complex knowledge

Chaos and creativity in dynamic idea evaluation: Theorizing the organization of problem‐based portfolios

“…These improvement ideas ease negotiations by helping people to strengthen their existing ideas and make them ready for implementation. To facilitate the divergent and convergent production from the evaluation knowledge, a range of appropriate creativity techniques (Castellano, Davidson, & Khelladi, 2017; Couger, 1996; Couger, Higgins, & McIntyre, 1993; Isaksen & Treffinger, 1985) can be deployed directly. For example, combined hierarchical listing of ideas (e.g., Belkin et al, 1993; Müller‐Wienbergen, Müller, Seidel, & Becker, 2011), text and image stimuli based on qualitative evaluations, and force field analysis (e.g., Couger, 1996; Couger et al, 1993) can be used to facilitate an iterative process of idea evaluation and creative production (e.g., Ulrich, 2018).…”

A Complex Adaptive Systems Approach to Real-Life Team Interaction Patterns, Task Context, Information Sharing, and Effectiveness

“…He suggested that efficient use of information technology creates higher levels of team participation and interaction between virtual team members, which is crucial for high performance. As virtual teams tend to operate mostly in the context of knowledge-intensive tasks (Castellano, Davidson, & Khelladi, 2017) and can, thus, be considered as working in a nonroutine-type task context, highly participative team interaction in such teams enhances the transfer of knowledge and information. Therefore, we expect that in such nonroutine contexts, participative team interaction patterns enhance perceived information sharing.…”

IT outsourcing, knowledge transfer and project transition phases

“…The conceptual framework for this research is from the knowledge-based view (KBV) of the firm, which is the assumption that knowledge resources and the firm's ability to exploit the knowledge resources facilitate the firm's intellectual capital or uniqueness and determine the competitive advantage of the firm (Levitas, 2013). The capability of firms to operate within a global environment is directly tied to the firm's ability to acquire, reuse and create organizational knowledge (Castellano et al, 2017). Knowledge transfer within IT environments is essential to the success of organizations because organizational performance has become critical to organizational abilities to sustain competitive advantage (Chien-Hsing et al, 2010).…”

“…However, KT management and KT processes are chaotic, underutilized and unstandardized within the opening and closing phases of the ITO project. While some KT research suggests planned KT is a criterion for successful ITO projects (Strasser et al, 2019), others suggest that informal processes should be expected not only during the opening phase of the ITO project, but leaders may want to encourage the use of informal processes, enabling tacit knowledge exchanges that include knowledge transfer of cultural norms and other context-specific knowledge such as work routines, policies and management practices (Castellano et al, 2017).…”