The Oxford Handbook of Music Education, Volume 2 2012
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928019.013.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creativity in Partnership Practices

Abstract: Collaborative partnership is becoming an increasingly popular instructional method in arts education. This article examines the relationship between policy agendas and creativity in music education partnerships. It presents four cases from Ireland, Hong Kong, Norway, and the United States. When viewed as a policy option, partnerships—despite their varying missions, structures, participants, forms, processes, and functions—share the key component of commitment to creativity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with any collaboration, communication in the planning stages was critical. While working enthusiastically and professionally across the three sites proved a worthy initiative for all concerned, it did take time to set up (Colley, Eidsaa, Kenny, & Leung, 2012; Holdhus & Espeland, 2013; Kezar, 2005). As authors, the study supported our professional learning (Bates et al, 2011; Trust et al, 2016; Watson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with any collaboration, communication in the planning stages was critical. While working enthusiastically and professionally across the three sites proved a worthy initiative for all concerned, it did take time to set up (Colley, Eidsaa, Kenny, & Leung, 2012; Holdhus & Espeland, 2013; Kezar, 2005). As authors, the study supported our professional learning (Bates et al, 2011; Trust et al, 2016; Watson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the field of music education, there has been a growing concern and change in what Folkestad (2006, p. 136) views as “a general shift in focus – from teaching to learning, and consequently from teacher to learner.” Due to this shift, examining where music learning occurs and how it occurs has meant an increased focus on “local” music or “community music” research (Bennett, 2000; Colley, Eidsaa, Kenny, & Leung, 2012; Cottrell, 2004; Downing, Lord, Jones, Martin, & Springate, 2007; Duffy, 2000; Finnegan, 2007; Higgins, 2012; Kenny, 2009, 2011, 2012; O’Neill, Sloboda, Boulton, & Ryan, 2001; Pitts, 2005; Shuker, 2008; Slobin, 1993; Veblen, Elliott, Messenger & Silverman, 2013). In examining musical learning within a CoMP this case study is built on the premise that learning is “situated” (Koopman, 2007; Lave & Wenger, 1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Definitions and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, studies on assessing pupils' compositions have discussed various aspects of assessment. It is acknowledged that assessing pupil composition is a particular topic of composition assessment, since it requires addressing pupils' experiences and the educational context: with what creative tools and means are the students familiar; what creative tasks had they been assigned; what music creativity criteria were applied in specific instances (Murphy, 1999;Stauffer, 2002;Wiggins, 2003;Colley et al, 2012;Cross, Laurence, Rabinowitch, 2012;Lapidaki, de Groot, Stagkos, 2012;Leong et al, 2012;Saether, Mbye, Shayesteh, 2012;Menard, 2015).…”
Section: Išvados Ir Diskusijamentioning
confidence: 99%