Creative Search and Strategic Sense‐making: Missing Dimensions in the Concept of Dynamic Capabilities

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the role of managerial agency in creating and shaping dynamic capabilities. We argue that dynamic capability is a phenomenon that enables a deviation to take place from the knowledge that otherwise would have arisen cumulatively from experiential learning. In addition we argue that to create major changes in patterns of knowledge accumulation managers need to be purposefully and creatively engaged. Such agency is identifiable in two cognitive processes we call creative search and strategic sense-making. We show how these processes differ in respect to their temporal orientation and relationship to uncertainty and by adopting a process perspective we demonstrate how creative search, strategic sense-making and experiential learning are complementary. This notion of complementarity implies that these processes, notwithstanding their contrasting characteristics, coexist together and serve to offer an explanation for how knowledge progresses at a firm level. Variance is introduced into the framework proposed through the identification of factors that influence the coexistence of creative search and strategic sense-making. The argument developed is illustrated through the use of an emergent technology context.

Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty

“…This refers to the concepts of knowledge management and organizational memory. This implies that scanning and interpretation are not solely concerned with the external environment, but a Iso consider the experience learned through the action of enactment and selection (Pandza and Thorpe, 2009). …”

Perceiving ‘capability’ within dynamic capabilities: The role of owner-manager self-efficacy

“…Nevertheless, there are debates regarding the degree to which dynamic capabilities are patterned. Since Winter (2003) suggests that pure forms of highly routine conceptualisations of dynamic capabilities may not be found in practice, we join scholars such as Teece (2012) and Pandza and Thorpe (2009) in conceptualising dynamic capabilities as containing both patterned elements (common practices) and non-routine elements. This makes the concept of dynamic capabilities more practically relevant and supports empirical research into such capabilities.…”

Putting resilient sustainability into strategy decisions – case studies

“…In total 11 interviews at different non-test organisations showed some similarities between their decision-making processes and the test organisations', all using strategic sensePutting Resilient Sustainability into Strategy Decisions -case studies final Page 9 of 26 making to reduce uncertainty (Pandza and Thorpe, 2009) and enable organisational learning (Senge, 1990). Best-practice approaches for sustainability and resilience exist in a few places only, possibly because applying rigour to such complex emergent issues successfully via Critical Thinking (Higgins and Freedman, 2013) and non-traditional learning/adaption techniques (Kurtz and Snowden, 2003) is difficult.…”