2017
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-5-21-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative computing with Landlab: an open-source toolkit for building, coupling, and exploring two-dimensional numerical models of Earth-surface dynamics

Abstract: Abstract. The ability to model surface processes and to couple them to both subsurface and atmospheric regimes has proven invaluable to research in the Earth and planetary sciences. However, creating a new model typically demands a very large investment of time, and modifying an existing model to address a new problem typically means the new work is constrained to its detriment by model adaptations for a different problem.Landlab is an open-source software framework explicitly designed to accelerate the develo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
157
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This range is consistent with results inferred from field work and map studies (Flint, 1974;Howard and Kerby, 1983;Tarboton et al, 1989Tarboton et al, , 1991Willgoose et al, 1990;Willgoose, 1994;Moglen and Bras, 1995;Snyder et al, 2000). Furthermore, many researchers specifically suggest, or offer as a default, the ratio m/n ∌ 0.5 (Snyder et al, 2000;Banavar et al, 2001;Hobley et al, 2017). The choice of this ratio is paramount in numerical landscape evolution models (LEMs) that utilize SPIM, such as the channel-hillslope integrated landscape development model, CHILD (Tucker et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This range is consistent with results inferred from field work and map studies (Flint, 1974;Howard and Kerby, 1983;Tarboton et al, 1989Tarboton et al, , 1991Willgoose et al, 1990;Willgoose, 1994;Moglen and Bras, 1995;Snyder et al, 2000). Furthermore, many researchers specifically suggest, or offer as a default, the ratio m/n ∌ 0.5 (Snyder et al, 2000;Banavar et al, 2001;Hobley et al, 2017). The choice of this ratio is paramount in numerical landscape evolution models (LEMs) that utilize SPIM, such as the channel-hillslope integrated landscape development model, CHILD (Tucker et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our result calls into question the common usage of the ratio m/n = 0.5 in landscape evolution models (Gasparini et al, 2006). For example, the Python-based landscape modeling environment, Landlab (Hobley et al, 2017) offers a default m/n ratio of 0.5. Our result also motivates further investigation as to why analysis of field data commonly yields values of m/n ∌ 0.5 (e.g., Snyder et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An array of sediment depths at all grid nodes could be found by typing grid.at_node ["soil__depth"]. The treatment of boundary conditions in Landlab grids is described thoroughly by Hobley et al (2017) and Adams et al (2017). In short, nodes may be set as "boundary" nodes and then defined as open, fixed-gradient, or closed boundaries.…”
Section: Implementing Space In Landlab Landlab Modeling Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a grid architecture, a suite of pre-built components for modeling surface or nearsurface processes, and utilities that handle data creation, management, and interoperability among process components (Tucker et al, 2016;Hobley et al, 2017;. The LandslideProbability component is written in Python and implemented with a model driver (written as a Jupyter Notebook) using the workflow shown in Fig.…”
Section: Model Development In Landlabmentioning
confidence: 99%