Creative Accounting Practices at Satyam Computers Limited: A Case Study of India’s Enron

Abstract

<p>Satyam Computers were once the crown jewel of Indian IT industry, however, the debacle of Satyam raised a debate about the role of CEO in driving a company to the heights of success and its relation with the board members and core committees. The scam brought to the light the role of corporate governance (CG) in shaping the protocols related to the working of audit committees and duties of board members. The Satyam scam was a jolt to the market, especially to Satyam stockholders. This paper attempts an in-depth analysis of India’s Enron, Satyam Computer’s “creative-accounting” scandal. In public companies, this type of ‘creative’ accounting leading to fraud and investigations are, therefore, launched by the various governmental oversight agencies. The accounting fraud committed by the founders of Satyam in 2009 is a testament to the fact that “the science of conduct is swayed in large by human greed, ambition, and hunger for power, money, fame and glory.” Scandals have proved that “there is an urgent need for good conduct based on strong corporate governance, ethics and accounting & auditing standards.” The Satyam scandal highlights the importance of securities laws and CG in emerging markets. Indeed, Satyam fraud “spurred the government of India to tighten the CG norms to prevent recurrence of similar frauds in future.” Thus, major financial reporting frauds need to be studied for ‘lessons-learned’ and ‘strategies-to-follow’ to reduce the incidents of such frauds in the future. The increasing rate of white-collar crimes “demands stiff penalties, exemplary punishments, and effective enforcement of law with the right spirit.”</p><h2> </h2>

Pressure, Dysfunctional Behavior, Fraud Detection and Role of Information Technology in the Audit Process

“…Fraud is a problematic phenomenon in the world which has a lot of effects to economic sectors (Bhasin, 2013). A survey from PriceWaterhouseCoopers in 2009 revealed that 30% of all of the companies had faced criminalization economic in past 12 months with a huge loss in business activity (Gullkvist and Jokipii, 2013).…”

Committee on board: Does it matter? A study of Indonesian Sharia-listed firms

“…It is believed that the investors' trust and confidence come along with the presence of independent and qualified audit committee (Leung, Richardson, & Jaggi, 2014). In addition, the financial frauds occur due to the small number of independent audit committee (Bhasin, 2013) and the minimum number of audit committee meeting (Yunos, Ahmad, & Sulaiman, 2014).…”

Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from India

“…(Bhasin, 2013;Sen et al, 2014) as well as abroad such as Enron Corporation, Global Crossing, WorldCom, Adelphia, Tyco etc. (Bhasin, 2013;Hogan et al, 2008;Pathak & Wells, 2008) where frauds were committed and investors cheated. These frauds were such that they were not identified from financial statements at the time.…”

“…These frauds were such that they were not identified from financial statements at the time. Emphasizing the need for an independent audit committee, Bhasin (2013) asserted that one of the factors contributing to the Satyam fraud was weak independent directors and audit committee. Had audit committee comprised greater number of independent directors, the financial accounts might not have been manipulated for so long.…”