1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01199073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creation and boundary evaluation of CSG-models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of the CSG modelling method is that it can define complex objects with a compact and simple data structure. Two solid modelling methods can be converted to each other and there is literature discussing the integration of B-Rep and CSG (Pilz and Kamel 1989, Kodiyalam et al 1990, Shapiro and Vossler 1993. (Refer to Appendix.…”
Section: Solid Product Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the CSG modelling method is that it can define complex objects with a compact and simple data structure. Two solid modelling methods can be converted to each other and there is literature discussing the integration of B-Rep and CSG (Pilz and Kamel 1989, Kodiyalam et al 1990, Shapiro and Vossler 1993. (Refer to Appendix.…”
Section: Solid Product Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike piecewise parametric surfaces, implicit surfaces are not akin to local shape changes interactively. Also, rendering an implicitly-defined algebraic surface poses some difficulties because it requires its preliminary triangulation [RV85, PK89,Gom03], particularly for implicit surfaces defined by high degree polynomial functions; hence, the low degree algebraic surface patches or algebraic splines used for geometric modeling [Baj88, BX97, LPP06, CCD00, War89, WZ00].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%