Abstract. This study examined the validity and clinical implications of the assumption of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) formula that age, gender, race, and BUN account for creatinine production (CP). The relationships of MDRD GFR, CP, and nutrition were examined in 1074 Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Wave II patients with reported measured creatinine clearances at initiation of dialysis. Age, gender, race, BUN, and serum creatinine (Scr) were used to calculate MDRD GFR. The measured 24-h urinary creatinine was used to estimate CP. In linear regression, Scr positively correlated with CP independent of age, gender, race, and BUN. Compared with the highest CP quartile, the lowest CP quartile had lower creatinine clearance (5.8 Ϯ 2.9 versus 11.3 Ϯ 3.4 ml/min, P Ͻ .01) despite lower Scr (5.8 Ϯ 2.6 versus 8.6 Ϯ 3.1 mg%, P Ͻ .01). There was an excellent correlation between the reciprocal of Scr and the MDRD GFR (r ϭ 0.90). As a result, the MDRD GFR was higher in the lowest CP quartile (10.9 Ϯ 4.6 versus 7.6 Ϯ 2.4 ml/min, P Ͻ .01). Malnutrition (48% versus 26%, P Ͻ .01) was more common in the lowest CP quartile. Each 5-ml/min increase in MDRD GFR was associated with 21% higher odds of malnutrition (P ϭ 0.046) in a multivariable logistic regression, which was abolished by controlling for CP. The fundamental assumption of the MDRD formula is invalid in patients with advanced renal failure, and the use of this formula in these patients might introduce biases. Serum creatinine (Scr) level is a function of creatinine production and renal excretion. Age, gender, race, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) are unlikely to fully account for creatinine production. However, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation that relies on age, gender, race, BUN, and serum creatinine to estimate the GFR implicitly assumes that age, gender, race, and BUN account for creatinine production (1). If this assumption is not valid, then the MDRD estimate of GFR in patients with low and high creatinine production will be invalid, as Scr is the most important predictor variable in the MDRD formula accounting for 80.4% of the variability in estimated GFR (2). The validity of this assumption, hence the applicability of the MDRD formula, has not been rigorously tested in patients with advanced renal failure.The hypothesized associations of nutritional status and creatinine production with MDRD formula estimate of GFR are as follows. In malnourished patients with low muscle mass and low creatinine production, the Scr at initiation of dialysis will be low. If age, sex, race and BUN do not fully account for creatinine production and the MDRD estimate of GFR is inversely proportional to Scr, the MDRD GFR will be expected to be higher than the measured creatinine clearance in patients with low creatinine production. For the same reasons, in patients with high creatinine production, the MDRD GFR will be lower than the measured creatinine clearance. The overestimation of GFR in patients with low creatinine produc...