2017
DOI: 10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2017.0412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Virtual Learning Environment: Shared Online Learning in University Education

Abstract: This paper is devoted to the problem of reimagining higher education in Russia. Being a part of the larger international higher education system, Russian higher education is experiencing pressures brought by the rapid technological changes and the integration of the global economies. The development of the information society and the widespread diffusion of information technology give rise to new opportunities for learning. At the same time, they challenge established views and practices regarding how teaching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, openness stems from small groups collaboration, in the sense that open approaches often seem to stem from the sharing culture that normally exists among close colleagues, especially as far as using resources produced by others. This consideration is in line with the findings of Lopukhova & Makeeva (2017) and of Veletsianos (2015) who claim that both individual and systemic barriers exist to the adoption of open approaches and that close collaboration can strongly influence individual agency in the practice of openness. Adding to this, we can claim that the findings of Jhangiani et al (2016), that faculty who score higher in terms of openness personality are more likely to using and reusing OER; valuing both privacy and openness; and accepting some porosity across personal-professional and staff-student boundaries" (Cronin 2017: 7).…”
Section: Open Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…First, openness stems from small groups collaboration, in the sense that open approaches often seem to stem from the sharing culture that normally exists among close colleagues, especially as far as using resources produced by others. This consideration is in line with the findings of Lopukhova & Makeeva (2017) and of Veletsianos (2015) who claim that both individual and systemic barriers exist to the adoption of open approaches and that close collaboration can strongly influence individual agency in the practice of openness. Adding to this, we can claim that the findings of Jhangiani et al (2016), that faculty who score higher in terms of openness personality are more likely to using and reusing OER; valuing both privacy and openness; and accepting some porosity across personal-professional and staff-student boundaries" (Cronin 2017: 7).…”
Section: Open Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the findings agreed with Lopukhova and Makeeva, (2017) who stated that virtual learning gives opportunities and promotes effective learning environment that fosters and increase students' intellect. Also the study further supported Rosandich (2014) who submitted that virtual learning significantly useful for acquiring basic techniques of skills in basketball and darts.…”
Section: Acquiring Basic Chemistry Concepts Through Virtual Learning supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Teachers will often act as facilitators, organizing activities that engage learners directly rather than relying too heavily on lectures and memorization. Successful online learners have to be self-directed, stay motivated, and stay on top of their workload independently [18]. Collaboration is a key indicator of effectiveness in an online ecological English class.…”
Section: Basic Components Of An Online Learning Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%