2020
DOI: 10.1177/2394964320921071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Value with Artificial Intelligence: A Multi-stakeholder Perspective

Abstract: This article provides a brief overview of artificial intelligence (AI), and its perceived value-creation potential as well as its perceived risks from a multi-stakeholder perspective. It also draws some guidelines for exploring a high-level AI business strategy by taking a multi-stakeholder perspective into consideration, i.e., shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers and society. A short survey among European business professionals reveals a perception that AI serves mainly financial purposes and is perc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, scholars may wish to explore the proposed dynamics in the context of new technologies, including artificial intelligence (Güngör, 2020; Kaartemo & Helkkula, 2018; Russo-Spena et al, 2018), social media (Brey, 2019), cognitive technologies (Mele et al, 2018) or digital networks (e.g., Boswijk, 2017), which are expected to offer pertinent implications for value creation in increasingly digital or phygital CJs.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, scholars may wish to explore the proposed dynamics in the context of new technologies, including artificial intelligence (Güngör, 2020; Kaartemo & Helkkula, 2018; Russo-Spena et al, 2018), social media (Brey, 2019), cognitive technologies (Mele et al, 2018) or digital networks (e.g., Boswijk, 2017), which are expected to offer pertinent implications for value creation in increasingly digital or phygital CJs.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, interaction has been defined as “mutual or reciprocal action or influence” (Vargo & Lusch, 2016, p. 9). While CE-based interactivity, traditionally, transpires through the customer’s interactions with human stakeholders (e.g., service employees/fellow customers), it can also manifest through their interactions with non-human entities, including service robots, chatbots, or virtual reality-based interfaces (e.g., Güngör, 2020; Storbacka et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IT firm managers are worried about the data being misused for other commercial purposes, while government policymakers and hospital management are concerned about the trustworthiness of the AI algorithm [47]. In Europe, a short survey by Güngör showed that business entities have positive feedback towards AI deployment but society perceived AI as bringing more risk than value [48]. Puaschunder conducted a survey, on a group of stakeholders consisting of academia, business, healthcare professionals, public and legal representations, to investigate the use of AI, robotics and big data in healthcare.…”
Section: Stakeholder Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial intelligence innovation can also create examination by revealing partners' exchangeable examples. This is because artificial intelligence is the umbrella for various methodologies that permit PCs/frameworks to perform with human-like capacities through understanding, hearing, understanding, and thinking (Güngör, 2020).…”
Section: "Engageable" Enrich the Engagement Via Gamification And Arti...mentioning
confidence: 99%