Creating Software Process Capability/Maturity Models

Wangenheim, Christiane Gresse von; Hauck, Jean Carlo Rossa; Zoucas, Alessandra; Salviano, Clenio F.; McCaffery, Fergal; Shull, Forrest

doi:10.1109/ms.2010.96

Cited by 82 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A large number of new maturity models has been developed (34 new maturity models were developed in 2009 and 2010 alone (Wendler 2012)). The similarities and differences between maturity models are well studied in a number of surveys, that compare various aspects of the maturity models, including aspects of the models themselves (Wangenheim et al 2010;Mettler et al 2010) and the research methods that lead to their development (Van Looy et al 2013;Wendler 2012;De Bruin and Rosemann 2005b;Becker et al 2009). These surveys show that, while maturity models may differ along a large number of dimensions, the properties that they share and that identify them as maturity models, are that they present a number of stages of maturity and a set of capabilities that can be measured to determine the stage of maturity (Wendler 2012).…”

Section: Bpm Maturitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BPM maturity is a measure to evaluate how professionally an organization manages its business processes. Previous research provides evidence that higher BPM maturity leads to better performance of processes and of the organization as a whole. It also claims that different organizations should strive for different levels of maturity, depending on their properties. This paper presents an empirical investigation of these claims, based on a sample of 120 organizations and looking at a selection of organizational properties. Our results reveal that higher BPM maturity contributes to better performance, but only up to a point. Interestingly, it contradicts the popular belief that higher innovativeness is associated with lower BPM maturity, rather showing that higher innovativeness is associated with higher BPM maturity. In addition, the paper shows that companies in different regions have a different level of BPM maturity. These findings can be used as a benchmark and a motivation for organizations to increase their BPM maturity.

show abstract

Section: Bpm Maturitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the evaluation, we will seed initial information on 52 MCMs based on a systematic literature review [18] and invite MCM authors and researchers to use the repository in trial runs intending to evaluate the repositories' utility and usability (including effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction). This will be performed through an Expert Panel [20] which is going to take place after the repository be turned public available.…”

Section: Next Stepsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building a maturity & capability model repository

Wangenheim

Hauck

Buglione

et al. 2011

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A complicated and time-consuming phase in the development of Maturity/Capability Models (MCMs) is the identification of existing relevant source models as, currently, information on existing MCMs is provided in very different forms and levels of detail on diverse web sites, publications etc. In this paper, we present our ongoing research on developing a web-based repository to store and provide overview information on MCMs as a continuous knowledge management effort maintained within the Software Process Improvement (SPI) community. Such a centralized repository containing metadata on MCMs is expected to facilitate the identification of relevant models (as well as parts) and provide a systematic basis for the development/evolution or customization of MCMs.

show abstract

“…Undoubtedly, software process capability and maturity (SPCM) models are reached a large use in industry [14]. These models are collection of software engineering best practices that help organization to improve their process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A study about HCI in practice of interactive system development using CMMI-DEV

Gonçalves

Oliveira

Kolski

2017

Proceedings of the 29th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) community has proposed many methods, techniques and standards for the development of interactive systems. Despite the great recognition of many of these approaches in academia, little is known about the state of practice in industry. To what extent are they known and used, while using a defined software process, to develop interactive systems? What is their level of use compared to software engineering approaches? This paper presents a study that we have conducted to answer these questions. This study is developed on top ___________________________ 169Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page.

show abstract

Creating Software Process Capability/Maturity Models

Cited by 82 publications

References 12 publications

Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance

Properties that influence business process management maturity and its effect on organizational performance

Building a maturity & capability model repository

A study about HCI in practice of interactive system development using CMMI-DEV

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About