2008
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating social entrepreneurship in local government

Abstract: The public sector is often considered synonym with inefficiency and a lack of motivation to be innovative. This paper seeks to contribute towards the literature surrounding social entrepreneurship in the public sector, through using institutional theory to underpin an e-Innovations model that promotes social entrepreneurship, while recognising how the adoption of innovation within the public sector is fostered. The proposed model seeks to serve as a process that threatens the conservative and risk-averse cultu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agent is driving the requirement for a transformation of service delivery through t-government (Weerakkody et al, 2009). Innovation, greater empowerment, more collaborative relationships and collective responsibility amongst staff and customers, are also driving t-government (Irani and Elliman, 2008). The UK Central Government collaboration agenda (Simpson, 2011), which calls…”
Section: T-government Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agent is driving the requirement for a transformation of service delivery through t-government (Weerakkody et al, 2009). Innovation, greater empowerment, more collaborative relationships and collective responsibility amongst staff and customers, are also driving t-government (Irani and Elliman, 2008). The UK Central Government collaboration agenda (Simpson, 2011), which calls…”
Section: T-government Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-government is also a key component of the central governments recent information technology (IT) strategy (Cabinet Office, 2011). Furthermore, there have been calls to implement innovative t-government initiatives from the normative literature (Irani and Elliman, 2008;Heeks, 2008;Hackney et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we seek to counterbalance the still dominant private-sector BPM network studies, in order to provide arguments for implementing BPM networks in general. Our approach conforms to the rich body of IS research in the public sector (Pan et al, 2006;Silva and Hirschheim, 2007;Heeks and Stanforth, 2007;Irani and Elliman, 2008). Second, choosing Europe and Asia as regions for comparison follows the logic that, as a major component of modern BPM, BPR originated from the Anglo-Saxon classical school of scientific management (Peppard and Fitzgerald, 1997) and prior studies have argued extensively on the specifics of that approach in the Asian (Martinsons and Hempel, 1998;Khong and Richardson, 2003;Ranganathan and Dhaliwal, 2001;Wu, 2002;Khoong, 1996) and European contexts (Albizu and Olazaran, 2006;Pritchard and Armistead, 1999;Larsen and Bjorn-Andersen, 2001;Stroetmann, 1994).…”
Section: 1 Sector and Country Selection And Comparative Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current public sector organisations do not compete with potential rivals and therefore do not need to care about competitiveness in terms of quality of service delivery or costs. In other words, public sector organisations are often seen to be inefficient and ineffective in their use of rare resources (Irani and Elliman, 2008). Here, SE shows one possible way to overcome these inefficiencies through including market discipline (Dees, 1998).…”
Section: Social Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%