2018
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating prognostic systems for cancer patients: A demonstration using breast cancer

Abstract: Integrating additional prognostic factors into the tumor, lymph node, metastasis staging system improves the relative stratification of cancer patients and enhances the accuracy in planning their treatment options and predicting clinical outcomes. We describe a novel approach to build prognostic systems for cancer patients that can admit any number of prognostic factors. In the approach, an unsupervised learning algorithm was used to create dendrograms and the C‐index was used to cut dendrograms to generate pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age of the patient, size of the tumor and molecular biological factors such as ER, PR or Her-2 expression are notable factors affecting the prognosis of breast cancer (50,51). In addition, whether the tumor was associated with lymph nodes and distant metastases also had an important impact on the patient's prognosis (52). According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, patients with BC with regional lymph node metastasis exhibit a 5-year survival rate of 85.5%, which is lower compared with the 5-year survival rate in patients with a localized tumor (98.8%) (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age of the patient, size of the tumor and molecular biological factors such as ER, PR or Her-2 expression are notable factors affecting the prognosis of breast cancer (50,51). In addition, whether the tumor was associated with lymph nodes and distant metastases also had an important impact on the patient's prognosis (52). According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, patients with BC with regional lymph node metastasis exhibit a 5-year survival rate of 85.5%, which is lower compared with the 5-year survival rate in patients with a localized tumor (98.8%) (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the prediction of the survival of cancer patients is mainly based on clinical stages, which were determined by tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. 14 Development of novel prognostic factors may guide the selection of treatment options and the prediction of outcomes, which in turn benefit patients’ survival. 14 The expression pattern and functionality of NLIPMT have only been investigated in breast cancer, in which NLIPMT was downregulated, and overexpression of NLIPMT was shown to inhibit cancer metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 Development of novel prognostic factors may guide the selection of treatment options and the prediction of outcomes, which in turn benefit patients’ survival. 14 The expression pattern and functionality of NLIPMT have only been investigated in breast cancer, in which NLIPMT was downregulated, and overexpression of NLIPMT was shown to inhibit cancer metastasis. 12 This study is the first to report the downregulation of NLIPMT in CRC and the increased invasion and migration rates of CRC cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, other approaches such as nomogram and the Cancer Data Clustering Integration Algorithm (EACCD) were also applied to identify independent prognostic factors. Nomogram is a graphical prediction tool based on the Cox proportional hazard model that attempts to combine all proven prognostic factors and quantify the risk as accurately as possible . Because it does not require risk factors to be independent of each other, RPA outperforms the proportional risk model in identifying prognostic factors, and as a nonparametric technique, it makes no requirement on the underlying distribution of variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%