Creating pre-conditions for change in clinical practice: the influence of interactions between multiple contexts and human agency

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore what happens when changes to clinical practice are proposed and introduced in healthcare organisations. The authors use the implementation of Treatment Escalation Plans to explore the dynamics shaping the translational journey of a complex intervention from research into the everyday context of real-world healthcare settings.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative instrumental collective case study design was used. Data were gathered using qualitative interviews (n = 36) and observations (n = 46) in three English acute hospital trusts. Normalisation process theory provided the theoretical lens and informed data collection and analysis.FindingsWhile each organisation faced the same translational problem, there was variation between settings regarding adoption and implementation. Successful change was dependent on participants' ability to manage and shape contexts and the work this involved was reliant on individual capacity to create a new, receptive context for change. Managing contexts to facilitate the move from research into clinical practice was a complex interactive and iterative process.Practical implicationsThe paper advocates a move away from contextual factors influencing change and adoption, to contextual patterns and processes that accommodate different elements of whole systems and the work required to manage and shape them.Originality/valueThe paper addresses important and timely issues of change in healthcare, particularly for new regulatory and service-oriented processes and practices. Insights and explanations of variations in implementation are revealed which could contribute to conceptual generalisation of context and implementation.

UK Healthcare Workers’ Experiences of Major System Change in Elective Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reflections on Rapid Service Adaptation

“…51,52 We join other voices in emphasising the importance of involving those who will deliver change in decisions about how it should be done 36,44 We build on Myall and colleagues' contention that an overlooked aspect of successful change programmes is how clinical staff interact with and shape multiple aspects of their local context. 53 In this case, rapid change was possible because staff were given the autonomy to reflect on their local context and flexibly adapt existing working practices in a rapidly changing situation. However, we have identified a number of important nuances to this claim.…”

Frontline leadership for implementing clinical guidelines in Norwegian mental health services: a qualitative study

“…The Caring and collegial approach provides examples of withdrawal and avoidant behaviour associated with reactions to stress and conflicts. This approach and the Integrity and setting standards approach seem to be more in line with the inwardly focused approach, as described by Myall et al (2020), than the Curious and welcoming approach. Myall et al (2020) underline the importance of engaging beyond one's own unit for successful implementation.…”

“…The leaders varied between different leadership approaches to comply with what they believed would benefit the implementation process. In addition, the range of leadership approaches underline the complexity of coping with employee resistance to implementation as described by Myall et al (2020) and Guerrero et al (2016), among others. The range of leadership approaches suggested can also be explained by the constant shifts in the context.…”

“…The Curious and welcoming approach intends to affect the coherence or sense making by enthusiasm, motivation and respect. It contains attitudes that prepare the employees for the continuously changing processes in health care, and at the same time value cooperation and expressions from other units in an outwardly manner (Myall et al, 2020). The Curious and welcoming leadership approach furthermore emphasises reflexivity and rewarding, in line with reflexive monitoring .…”

Engaging to innovate: an investigation into the implications of engagement at work on innovative behaviors in healthcare organizations

“…Literature is consistent in maintaining that a participatory approach to organizational change is crucial to enhance the healthcare organizations' ability to address the evolving challenges that affect their long-term viability (Bess et al, 2009). A participatory approach to organizational change entails that transitions are implemented based on a dialog involving all those who are affected by the process of change (Myall et al, 2020). This allows them to have a role in steering or influencing the transformation of organizational processes and practices (Raelin, 2012), making change more consistent with the challenges that are faced by healthcare organizations (Montgomery et al, 2020).…”