2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8110906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Multi-Temporal Composites of Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy Data in Support of Digital Soil Mapping

Abstract: An increasing demand for full spatio-temporal coverage of soil information drives the growing use of soil spectroscopy. Soil spectroscopy application performed under laboratory conditions or in-field studies in semi-arid areas have shown promising results. However, when acquiring data in temperate zones, limitations by vegetation-free coverage, variation in soil moisture and management are driving coherent spatio-temporal data collection. This study explores the use of multi-temporal imaging spectroscopy data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the climate can be described as warm temperate humid, with a yearly mean temperature around 9.3 • C and annual precipitation around 1134 mm [52]. Soils comprise mainly clay loam or loam, and Cambisol [53].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the climate can be described as warm temperate humid, with a yearly mean temperature around 9.3 • C and annual precipitation around 1134 mm [52]. Soils comprise mainly clay loam or loam, and Cambisol [53].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, testing all unlabeled samples exhaustively from a large dataset is inefficient. It is especially true for hyperspectral imaging applications, in which a large population of soil spectra can be collected [48][49][50]. In such a scenario, testing all available unlabeled samples is impractical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we can also see that there are fixed moments in time where the increase is stronger than the average. These moments are mainly in spring and at the end of summer, which are known to be seeding and harvest periods [16]. The exact moment is weather dependent and therefore hard to predict.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability can be caused by differences between the Landsat sensors, including differences in atmospheric correction, differences between the bands, or differences in view angle. Additionally, the variability can be caused by differences in weather conditions and land management in the different time periods cause differences in soil moisture and soil surface roughness, which both influence the surface reflectance of the soil (also discussed in Diek et al [16]). Using the mean over the time periods reduces the variability; however, as Figure 11 shows, the bareness frequency changes for each time period.…”
Section: Variability Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%