2017
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2017/41.2.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating High-Value Real-World Impact through Systematic Programs of Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is accepted that this is a more technical that social scientific conception of kernel theory, but it is one that arguably aligns well with theory being considered as a means by from co-evolution of problem and solution spaces (Dorst & Cross, 2001) and is indeed "grounded" in practice. Nunamaker, Twyman, Giboney, and Briggs (2017) note that, for any given instance of a technology that can be used to improve a situation, a different instance can be built that will not-and, further, that subtle differences in instances may give rise to differences in efficacy. Our second observation relates to this point in that, once "moves are invented" (Schön, 1992) and a course of action is underway, a path dependency is created between problem and solution spaces, which narrows the solution space with the learning from each iteration of work.…”
Section: Artefact Mutabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is accepted that this is a more technical that social scientific conception of kernel theory, but it is one that arguably aligns well with theory being considered as a means by from co-evolution of problem and solution spaces (Dorst & Cross, 2001) and is indeed "grounded" in practice. Nunamaker, Twyman, Giboney, and Briggs (2017) note that, for any given instance of a technology that can be used to improve a situation, a different instance can be built that will not-and, further, that subtle differences in instances may give rise to differences in efficacy. Our second observation relates to this point in that, once "moves are invented" (Schön, 1992) and a course of action is underway, a path dependency is created between problem and solution spaces, which narrows the solution space with the learning from each iteration of work.…”
Section: Artefact Mutabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that design theory as presented here is key in achieving value, as it provides a map across the territory of the design space. Our design theory is nascent (Hevner & Gregor, 2013) and, thus, provides only potential for impact (Nunamaker et al, 2017). That path dependency captures and exposes both knowledge related to the design and knowledge related to the context (of the problem).…”
Section: Artefact Mutabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information systems (IS) researchers also increasingly recognize the need to make a visible practice impact (Agarwal & Lucas, ; Davison & Bjørn‐Andersen, ; Galletta et al, ; Nunamaker, Briggs, Derrick, & Schwabe, ; Nunamaker, Twyman, Giboney, & Briggs, ; Swanson, ; Wiener et al, ). As an academic discipline, the lack of demonstrable practice impact will eventually jeopardize our identity and viability (Agarwal & Lucas, ; Nunamaker et al, ; Swanson, ). Business school accrediting bodies such as the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) and the European Foundation for Management Development have revised their standards with impact at the core of business schools’ missions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australia's EI states, in the submission guidelines, that “the description of the impact should be driven by explicit evidence, for example cost‐benefit analysis, or adoption of public policy that leads to changes in behaviour” (Australian Research Council, , p. 19). How to manage research endeavors to make a visible impact?Impact can only manifest in practice. Yet, practitioners generally do not read or understand academic journals (Nunamaker et al, ). Demonstrating impact requires researchers to traverse the “last research mile,” that is, to go beyond assuming that proof‐of‐concept prototypes will generate value as a matter of course and conduct more sophisticated proof‐of‐value research to ascertain and maximize research value (Nunamaker et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%