2011
DOI: 10.1177/0163443711404464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the internet among bounded religious communities

Abstract: This article examines the motivation behind bounded groups’ creation of digital enclaves online. Through in-depth interviews with 19 webmasters and staff of selected Israeli Orthodox websites three critical areas of negotiation are explored: (1) social control; (2) sources of authority; and (3) community boundaries. Examining these tensions illuminates a detailed process of self-evaluation which leads religious stakeholders and internet entrepreneurs to form these digital enclaves in order to negotiate the cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of computing does not conflict with faith and ideology. One can work from home and use a 'kosher Internet program', namely have access to the Internet, which is restricted according to different Haredi requirements (Campbell & Golan, 2011). In a survey conducted in 2008 by the Ministry of Economy, 49% of ultraorthodox men were interested in academic education, and of these, 23% were interested in computer education of some sort (Malachi, Cohen, & Kaufman, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of computing does not conflict with faith and ideology. One can work from home and use a 'kosher Internet program', namely have access to the Internet, which is restricted according to different Haredi requirements (Campbell & Golan, 2011). In a survey conducted in 2008 by the Ministry of Economy, 49% of ultraorthodox men were interested in academic education, and of these, 23% were interested in computer education of some sort (Malachi, Cohen, & Kaufman, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular research themes at this stage included considering how the Internet challenges established religious authorities (Barker 2005), empowers new religious leaders (i.e., Campbell and Golan 2011), and provides new opportunities for traditional leaders to re-assert influence online (Barzilai-Nahon and Barzilai 2005). New theoretical and methodological frameworks were also taking shape.…”
Section: Comparative Study Of Digital Community Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in religious groups continues. For example, scholars have examined Internet use among communities of Islam (Anderson, 1999;Scholz, Selge, Stille, & Zimmermann, 2008), Buddhism (see Busch, 2011;Cheong, Huang, & Poon, 2011a;Kim, 2005), Hinduism (Scheifinger, 2010), and Orthodox Judaism (Campbell & Golan, 2011), to name a few. In addition, a few studies have looked at the religious use of technology among specific nations, such as Cheong, Poon, Huang, and Casas's (2009) investigation of Internet use by Christian and Buddhist groups in Singapore.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intertextuality of technology and spirituality suggests that "the integration of religious language with technology provides a cultural shorthand and a rich platform for communicating multiple meanings" (p. 1203). Campbell and Golan (2011) used in-depth interviews with 19 Orthodox Israeli Web masters and Web staff members to explore variations in how the digital spaces they create may be used to reinforce ties among the community without overt challenges to authority. Cheong et al (2011a) explored the interactions of religious authority and Internet communications in Buddhist organizations and among Christian congregations (Cheong et al, 2011b), concluding that "the immunity from accountability that clergy once enjoyed may have weakened in light of a more technologically networked congregation" (p. 954).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%