2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-011-9140-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating brand personality with brand names

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies support this association of front vowels (compared to back vowels) in brand names with the attributes small, light in weight, mild, thin, soft, more feminine, friendly, weak, light colored and pretty (Klink, 2000). More recently, research has linked vowel sound symbolism to brand personality perceptions (Klink and Athaide, 2012), operationalized in terms of Aaker's (1997) sincerity, sophistication, ruggedness, excitement and competence dimensions of brand personality. Brand names with front vowels (compared to back vowels) communicated sincerity and sophistication to a greater extent, whereas brand names with back vowels (compared to front vowels) increased perceptions of ruggedness.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Sound Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies support this association of front vowels (compared to back vowels) in brand names with the attributes small, light in weight, mild, thin, soft, more feminine, friendly, weak, light colored and pretty (Klink, 2000). More recently, research has linked vowel sound symbolism to brand personality perceptions (Klink and Athaide, 2012), operationalized in terms of Aaker's (1997) sincerity, sophistication, ruggedness, excitement and competence dimensions of brand personality. Brand names with front vowels (compared to back vowels) communicated sincerity and sophistication to a greater extent, whereas brand names with back vowels (compared to front vowels) increased perceptions of ruggedness.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Sound Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…likelihood to recommend the brand) to brand masculinity and femininity perceptions triggered by sound symbolism. Klink and Athaide (2012) related vowel sound symbolism to brand personality perceptions and showed that brand names with front vowels (compared to back vowels) communicate sincerity and sophistication to a greater extent, whereas brand names with back vowels (compared to front vowels) increase perceptions of ruggedness. Klink and Athaide (2012) did not examine the effect of consonants on brand personality perceptions.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well understood that brand names are an essential communicator of meaning (cf. Klink, 2000Klink, , 2003Klink and Athaide, 2011), and that they enhance marketing offers with benefits beyond the basic function of the core product or service (cf. del Rio et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has specifically shown that new brand names differing in suggestiveness and meaningfulness lead to branded entities holding different associations (Moore and Lehmann, 1982;Sen, 1999). Linguistic focused research has highlighted how the sound of brand names impacts the associations that consumers can have with the brand (Robertson, 1989;Argo et al, 2010;Klink and Athaide, 2012;Guèvremont and Grohmann, 2015).…”
Section: New Branded Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%