Inspired by recent breakthroughs with topological quantum materials, which pave the way to novel, highefficiency, low-energy magnetoelectric devices [1][2][3] and fault-tolerant quantum information processing [4], inter alia, topological quantum walks has emerged as an exciting topic in its own right, especially due to the theoretical and experimental simplifications this approach offers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Motivated by impressive progress in topological quantum walks, we provide a perspective on theoretical studies and experimental investigations of topological quantum walks focusing on current explorations of topological properties arising for single-walker quantum walks.Quantum walk history traces back to 1993 [15] when Yakir Aharonov, Luis Davidovich and Nicim Zagury proposed the notion of the "quantum random walk" with this nomenclature indicating a quantum version of the ubiquitous random walk in classical physics [16]. Eight years later, computer scientist Dorit Aharonov, who coincidentally is Yakir Aharonov's niece, and her colleagues Andris Ambainis, Julia Kempe and Umesh Vazirani, introduced a quantum walk on a general regular graph G [17]. At the same conference, quantum walks on one-dimensional lattices with Hadamard coin operators (coherently flipping a coin to a superposition of 'head' and 'tails') was introduced to compare with the case of the symmetric random walk [18]. One year later, onedimensional quantum walks were generalised to two-and higher-dimensional quantum walks [19].Quantum walks have become germane to quantum computation [20][21][22] and quantum simulation [23][24][25] and single-walker versions are amenable to experimental implementations including ion traps [26,27] and both free-space linear optics [28] and on photonic chips [29]. Quantum walks are typically classified into discrete-and continuous-time quantum walks with the main difference being whether free evolution is interrupted by quantum coin 'flips' followed by coin-dependent translations or whether evolution is continuous involving entangling between the walker and internal, or coin, degrees of freedom [30]. For a discrete-time quantum walk on G of degree m, the Hilbert-space dimension of the coin is m [17,18]. As coin and translation operators act repeat-edly on the walker space, the the discrete-time quantumwalk Hamiltonian is periodic in the time domain, which indicates that the discrete-time quantum walk is a Floquet system. Continuous-time quantum evolution on G is governed by a static Hamiltonian, which is the adjacency matrix for G [31]. Any Hamiltonian describing a lattice model can equivalently be used to drive a continuous-time quantum walk on corresponding G such as the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model [32] or spin-orbit coupling Hamiltonian [13]. Discrete-and continuous-time quantum walks are approximately equivalent under a Trotter approximation in the continuous-time limit [33]. Now we connect the quantum walk to topology, which concerns global properties that are invariant under continuous deforma...