2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating and detecting fake reviews of online products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that increasing the data set size would help the classifier better separate pain point tweets from those not containing a pain point. This task would be better achieved with a classifier that has had robust performance in similar tasks (e.g., fake review detection; Salminen et al 2022), which is a technically similar problem (i.e., text classification with binary classes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that increasing the data set size would help the classifier better separate pain point tweets from those not containing a pain point. This task would be better achieved with a classifier that has had robust performance in similar tasks (e.g., fake review detection; Salminen et al 2022), which is a technically similar problem (i.e., text classification with binary classes).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extreme cases, they led to financial loss for companies and legal cases [56]. While traditionally, fake reviewers are written by humans, with the advancement of Natural Language Generation technology, it has been shown that fake reviews automatically generated by programs are even more difficult for human annotators to detect [57]. There is an extensive amount of studies on automated fake review detection and for that reason, we refer readers to the surveys by [54] while below we present a brief overview of this field, highlighting the novelty of our work.…”
Section: Fake Product Review Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus similar to product classification, it involves extracting features of the review text (metadata), representing them in a machine processable format (feature representation), and training a model that is able to generalise patterns using the features and apply the patterns to unseen data (algorithm). In terms of features (metadata), [57] broadly categorised them into 'lexical' and 'non-lexical'. Lexical features are attributes derived from text, such as words, n-grams, punctuations and latent topics.…”
Section: Fake Product Review Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations