2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04066.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating and Analyzing a Statewide Nursing Quality Measurement Database

Abstract: This working model for collecting reliable and valid data was derived from multiple hospitals across California. The data are the basis for studies to contribute to the development of evidence-based public policy, and for ongoing study of the effects of nurse staffing on clinical and service outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
46
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure ulcer prevention rests squarely in the domain of nursing care. There is a professional organization of nurses with extensive training in skin care, an array of prevention technologies, standardized surveillance definitions, an established methodology for determining prevalence, and large benchmarking projects, including the American Nurses Association National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, implemented in the early 1990s [21], and the California Nursing Outcomes Coalition, beginning in 1996 [22,23]. Thus, pressure ulcer prevention might be characterized as at least T3 to T4 at the time of the HAC policy roll out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure ulcer prevention rests squarely in the domain of nursing care. There is a professional organization of nurses with extensive training in skin care, an array of prevention technologies, standardized surveillance definitions, an established methodology for determining prevalence, and large benchmarking projects, including the American Nurses Association National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, implemented in the early 1990s [21], and the California Nursing Outcomes Coalition, beginning in 1996 [22,23]. Thus, pressure ulcer prevention might be characterized as at least T3 to T4 at the time of the HAC policy roll out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were transferred to a CALNOC automated Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and submitted to the data repository for these hospitals to benchmark their ongoing comparative performance. Additional details of the CALNOC procedures were described by Aydin et al 20,21 CALNOC maintains institutional review board (IRB) approval at both Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and the University of California San Francisco for ongoing data analyses related to benchmarking performance and research. Prevalence studies are performed for quality assurance purposes rather than research, so IRB approval at each individual hospital was not needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean duration of hospitalization and the occupancy rate can be considered as traditional indicators in relation to the production and the productivity of the health services and were used as overall performance indicators by the majority of hospitals in a previous study (2) , being included in the questionnaire applied to the nurses in the present study. However, less than 50% of the nurses systems (12)(13) and the NAGEH group (4) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of indicators of mortality, nosocomial infection rates, device use, unforeseen readmissions and others specifically related to the nursing processes, such as the incidence of falls, incidence of pressure ulcers, number of patients restrained in bed, patient satisfaction and hours of training were considered essential for evaluating the quality of the healthcare provided to the client (1,(12)(13) . Several authors stress that the knowledge, monitoring and analysis of these indicators should serve as a basis for the improvement of the nursing processes in the hospital institutions, since they constitute critical points of the processes related to the nursing care (3)(4) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%