2015
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating an oasis: some insights into the practice and theory of a successful academic writing group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For teams pursuing publication, related discussions around important issues necessary for successful publication including timelines, commitment to the project work, authorship, and publication venue are generally best conducted early in the project. [18][19][20]…”
Section: Inexplicit Initial Assessment Of Publication Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For teams pursuing publication, related discussions around important issues necessary for successful publication including timelines, commitment to the project work, authorship, and publication venue are generally best conducted early in the project. [18][19][20]…”
Section: Inexplicit Initial Assessment Of Publication Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success is measured by outputs, numbers of publications and the research funds that academics attract (Dwyer, Lewis, McDonald, & Burns, 2012). There is pressure on university academics to 'publish or perish ' (L'Huillier, 2012;McGrail, Rickard, & Jones, 2006;Wardale et al, 2015). For many academics, their publication record has become a routine part of academic staff performance reviews and fundamental to promotion and career advancement.…”
Section: Academic Writingpublish or Perishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature about writing groups is about 'academic' writing groups. It is rare for groups to be mixed (academic/non-academic members), though multidisciplinary academic groups are encouraged for a 'cross fertilisation of ideas' (Wardale et al, 2015(Wardale et al, , p. 1307. It is beneficial to get feedback and input from participants from different backgrounds and disciplines.…”
Section: A Diverse and Relational Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While programmes are starting to be set up to support certain kinds of writing, particularly writing for scholarly publication (e.g. Morss and Murray 2001), and people are experimenting with other kinds of support such as semi-formalised academic writing groups (Wardale et al 2015), much of the learning which academics engage in happens in an informal way, as they collaborate with other people on particular projects, learning as they go along. Studies such as Nygaard's investigation into the productivity of Norwegian academics (2017) have found that academic writing is a site of negotiation (Street 2003;Trede, Macklin, and Bridges 2012) in which collaborative learning plays an important role.…”
Section: Diversity Change and Learning In Academics' Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%