1999
DOI: 10.1080/00377319909517566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating an intersubjective context for self‐disclosure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must take up the issue of the role of personal disclosure in supervision and professional practice (Gelman, 2004;Maroda, 1999;Raines, 1996;Strean, 1997). Webb (1988) was clear that "the recognition of personal identity is a vital first step in the formation of professional identity" (p. 35), a position that has clear implications for the field instruction of cultural minority students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must take up the issue of the role of personal disclosure in supervision and professional practice (Gelman, 2004;Maroda, 1999;Raines, 1996;Strean, 1997). Webb (1988) was clear that "the recognition of personal identity is a vital first step in the formation of professional identity" (p. 35), a position that has clear implications for the field instruction of cultural minority students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanging in, bearing intense destabilizing affect and tolerating the unknown while formulating affective and relational meaning for both the patient and the therapist is challenging for every therapist (Bridges, 2001;Bromberg, 1998;Cooper, 1998;Darwin, 1999;Davies & Frawley, 1994;Ehrenberg, 1992;Maroda, 1991Maroda, , 1999aMaroda, , 1999bOgden, 1994;Stolorow, Atwood, & Brandchaft,1997).…”
Section: Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…From this perspective, the therapist's task is to remain fluid and follow the shifting dissociated communications, rather than to remain locked-in to any single repetitive enactment that may become perseverative and stifle movement in the relationship (Davies & Frawley, 1994). The therapeutic process of sorting out mutual enactments, and negotiating unwanted affect is, in fact, the intimate edge where transforming negotiations most often occur (Aron, 1991(Aron, , 1992Black, 2002;Benjamin, 1998;Bridges, 2001;Bromberg, 1998;Cooper, 1998;Davies & Frawley, 1994;Ehrenberg, 1992; STARTLING AFFECT IN THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIPS 15 Gorkin, 1987;Hoffman, 1983;Jacobs, 1991;Maroda, 1991Maroda, , 1999aMaroda, , 1999bMitchell, 1988Mitchell, , 2000Ogden, 1994). Aron (1996) states that, "Enactments are crucial therapeutic events that constitute the very essence of treatment" (p.215).…”
Section: Projective Identification and Enactmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Traditional psychodynamic theories have long eschewed any type of selfdisclosure, assuming that therapist neutrality was required for clients to acknowledge and reconcile their personal challenges (Maroda, 1999). Carl Rogers was one of the earliest theorists to challenge this assumption.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%