2010
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2010.488445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a climate for inter-organizational networking through people management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if leaders actively encourage their followers to engage in networking behavior, those followers are more likely to do so. For example, Jolink and Dankbaar (2010) argue that perceived supervisory support for networking increases inter-organizational networking by employees.…”
Section: Leader Networking Encouragementmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, if leaders actively encourage their followers to engage in networking behavior, those followers are more likely to do so. For example, Jolink and Dankbaar (2010) argue that perceived supervisory support for networking increases inter-organizational networking by employees.…”
Section: Leader Networking Encouragementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With minimal time and effort, followers can utilize the connections to get job-related work done, and use the time saved (which is a valuable COR resource) to accomplish other important tasks or to achieve work-life balance. Nurturing and developing connections requires time and effort (Jolink & Dankbaar, 2010), sometimes impinging on work-life balance (e.g., if it involves business dinners and out-of-office functions), and this can create job stress. If the benefits of networks can already be easily realized because of followers' association with their transformational leaders, then a COR resource such as time becomes more salient.…”
Section: The Downside Of Transformational Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Organizations in which employees face significant time pressures in performing their work may be less willing to invest the time in planned change efforts that require interagency collaboration. 74 Organizations with greater resources may also have advantages in building inter-organizational relationships, partly because they are better able to afford the time required for networking. 75 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7476 In addition to supervisory support, agencies that empower workers through greater job autonomy may form and maintain more effective intra- and interagency relationships. 7779 Other research has noted that organizations that are successful in implementing evidence-based practices have leaders who support implementation through workflow design and by conducting continuous monitoring, feedback, and reinforcement of implementation activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, organizational climate, or employees’ responses to the organizational environment, may be associated with the quality of interorganizational relationships. Indicators of organizational climate, such as employee job satisfaction and perceived job security, are linked to organizational capacity for interorganizational coordination (Jolink & Dankbaar, 2010; Smith & Mogro-Wilson, 2007; Wichinsky et al, 2012). …”
Section: Influence Of Organizational and Staff Characteristics On Iormentioning
confidence: 99%