1987
DOI: 10.1002/mus.880100108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creatine kinase isoforms following isometric exercise

Abstract: The present study assessed creatine kinase (CK) activity, CK MM isoforms, and muscle soreness following an exercise regimen designed to induce skeletal muscle damage. Eight college-age subjects performed 40 maximal isometric contractions of the knee extensor muscles (10-second contraction/20-second rest). Serum samples and soreness ratings were taken prior to and 2, 6, 18, and 24 hours after the exercise. The CK MM1 and CK MM3 isoforms were determined by flatbed isoelectric focusing (IEF). In serum, the MM1 is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be assessed not only by the magnitude of decrease in MIF, which was more than double that reported in previous studies (e.g. Jones et al, 1989), but also by increases in indirect markers of muscle damage, such as creatine kinase and relaxed elbow angle, which were several-fold higher compared with other isometric exercise protocols (Clarkson et al, 1985(Clarkson et al, , 1986(Clarkson et al, , 1987Nosaka et al, 2002). This may have been due to the protocol used in the present study, which involved 50 maximal contractions of 10 s with 20 s rest between contractions, with the elbow flexors stretched to a lengthened position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be assessed not only by the magnitude of decrease in MIF, which was more than double that reported in previous studies (e.g. Jones et al, 1989), but also by increases in indirect markers of muscle damage, such as creatine kinase and relaxed elbow angle, which were several-fold higher compared with other isometric exercise protocols (Clarkson et al, 1985(Clarkson et al, , 1986(Clarkson et al, , 1987Nosaka et al, 2002). This may have been due to the protocol used in the present study, which involved 50 maximal contractions of 10 s with 20 s rest between contractions, with the elbow flexors stretched to a lengthened position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Each muscle action was performed for 10 s, with 20 s of intervening rest. A similar exercise regimen has previously been shown to result in an increase in serum creatine kinase activity, which is indirect evidence of muscle damage (Clarkson et al, 1985(Clarkson et al, , 1987.…”
Section: Isometric Exercise Protocolmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, previous studies (3,5,19) reported little or no increases in CK, muscle soreness, and decrease in MVC after maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the knee extensors, reflecting little or no muscle damage after maximal voluntary isometric contractions. It is important to note that the voluntary isometric contractions performed in the present study were submaximal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted protocol for ERE induced no alarming CK responses, which could be indicative of excessive muscle damage. Furthermore, the CK reference values for women are 40 to 150 U/l [14). Although the magnitude of CK activity after exercise was small, when accompanied with NO increments after exercise in the HR subjects, it could be indicative of muscle damage and regeneration [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in serum CK concentration has been previously used as an indicator of muscular damage [12], and is still used in recent studies [13]. A particular problem in using serum CK concentration is due to its inter-subject variability, especially following exercise [14]. Similar baseline serum CK values and notable inter-subject variability after exercise, justifies classification of low and high responders and it can be partially explained by body composition [15], training status [15], and genetic factors [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%