2021
DOI: 10.1177/23743735211043383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craving Empathy: Studying the Sustained Impact of Empathy Training on Clinicians

Abstract: Evidence is sparse when it comes to the longitudinal impact of educational interventions on empathy among clinicians. Additionally, most available research on empathy is on medical trainee cohorts. We set out to study the impact of empathy and communication training on practicing clinicians’ self-reported empathy and whether it can be sustained over six months. An immersive curriculum was designed to teach empathy and communication skills, which entailed experiential learning with simulated encounters and dida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All other factors remained stable. This corresponds to the few studies in which affective factors are mentioned at all: For example, Mehta et al (2021) found no improvement directly following communication training to improve empathic behavior, similar findings were described by Sands et al (2008), Shapiro et al (2004) or Evans et al (1993). When improvements in affective skills were observed, either more situation-specific measurement instruments were used (Okonofua et al, 2016;Winter et al, 2020) or the samples were so small that generalization was not possible (Sands et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…All other factors remained stable. This corresponds to the few studies in which affective factors are mentioned at all: For example, Mehta et al (2021) found no improvement directly following communication training to improve empathic behavior, similar findings were described by Sands et al (2008), Shapiro et al (2004) or Evans et al (1993). When improvements in affective skills were observed, either more situation-specific measurement instruments were used (Okonofua et al, 2016;Winter et al, 2020) or the samples were so small that generalization was not possible (Sands et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…(1) on perspective taking indicates that PT as a cognitive skill is subject to developmental change during adolescence (Eisenberg et al, 2005;Farrell & Vaillancourt, 2020;Zahn-Waxler et al, 1992), which is the basis of many empathy trainings, among others (Bas-Sarmiento et al, 2017;Mehta et al, 2021;Paulus & Meinken, 2022b). In contrast, empathizing or engaging in fictional stories appears to be a strength of younger people, as indicated by steadily decreasing FS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain clinician characteristics and specific traits have been implicated in the formation of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider [13]. Empathy has been recognized as a long-standing important factor in the delivery of quality care [14], an area of focus for clinician training [15,16], and a contributing factor to the formation of a strong therapeutic alliance [17]. For example, robust correlations between the Working Alliance Inventory Bond Scale and the Empathy Scale of the Relationship Inventory (measuring empathy, congruence, and positive regard) have suggested that a vital component of a strong alliance is the therapist's understanding and relating to patient experience [17].…”
Section: Role Of the Clinician In Treatment Retention And Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%