2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crash testing and evaluation of a new generation L1 containment level guardrail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total length of the barrier was 64 m, including two 12-m-long turned-down end terminals. 9 The crash simulation model consisted of the road safety barrier and vehicle models. The barrier was designed according to the experimental tests.…”
Section: Finite Element Model For a Road Safety Barrier Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total length of the barrier was 64 m, including two 12-m-long turned-down end terminals. 9 The crash simulation model consisted of the road safety barrier and vehicle models. The barrier was designed according to the experimental tests.…”
Section: Finite Element Model For a Road Safety Barrier Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experimental tests, the total length of the crash test was 66 m for a type A guardrail. 9 In this study, only a 32 m road safety barrier was modeled to reduce the time analysis. Therefore, the remainder of the barrier (34 m) must be modeled.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that this barrier system increases the costs as well as its total weight. To decrease the barrier costs and weight, Atahan [16] suggests simplifying W-beam guardrail system, using 3 instead of its 5 elements, gaining the system weight of 18.6 kg/m and ensuring containment level L1.…”
Section: Choice Of Barrier Types Their Economic Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European standard EN 1317 classifies VRSs into different containment levels and requires carrying out standardized full-scale impact tests of any newly developed VRS (EN 1317 2010). However, the full-scale impact tests require substantial expenses (e.g., Atahan et al 2014). Therefore EN 1317 explicitly allows replacing those full-scale impact tests by computational simulations under certain limitations, in particular if a VRS is only subject to modifications (see Part 5 of EN 1317).…”
Section: Safety Barriers and Elements Of Vehicle Restraint Sytemsmentioning
confidence: 99%