2005
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniometric variation and population history of the prehistoric Tewa

Abstract: Although the population history and social organization of the prehistoric Pueblo Indians of the American Southwest have received attention in the archaeological literature, little research on this topic has been conducted by biological anthropologists. Here, we examine postmarital residence at two ancestral Tewa Indian pueblos located in north-central New Mexico using determinant ratio analysis. In addition, we examine genetic relationships among pueblos, as well as levels of within-pueblo heterogeneity due t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parent populations of most of immigrants analyzed in the present study had not been included in the gene pools of each local population which had until then been constituted by interaction with other populations. Several researchers have suggested the possibilities that extraregional gene flow and migration, and/or population aggregation increased intracemetery heterogeneity (Key and Jantz, 1990;Griffin et al, 2001;Stojanowski, 2003Stojanowski, , 2005bSchillaci and Stojanowski, 2005). The present study could not verify the temporal change of genetic variation, and it may be conceivable that relatively high intrapopulation relatedness and migration among the surrounding and extraregional populations had occurred without environmental change.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The parent populations of most of immigrants analyzed in the present study had not been included in the gene pools of each local population which had until then been constituted by interaction with other populations. Several researchers have suggested the possibilities that extraregional gene flow and migration, and/or population aggregation increased intracemetery heterogeneity (Key and Jantz, 1990;Griffin et al, 2001;Stojanowski, 2003Stojanowski, , 2005bSchillaci and Stojanowski, 2005). The present study could not verify the temporal change of genetic variation, and it may be conceivable that relatively high intrapopulation relatedness and migration among the surrounding and extraregional populations had occurred without environmental change.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Because Relethford and Blangero (1990) developed a model for the R-matrix method to analyze quantitative morphological traits, many researchers now use this method to elucidate probable human history and to compare variances within and among geographical groups (Relethford, 1991(Relethford, , 1994Relethford and Harpending, 1994;Powell and Neves, 1999;Steadman, 2001;González-José et al, 2003;Roseman and Weaver, 2004;Stojanowski, 2004Stojanowski, , 2005Hanihara and Ishida, 2005;Schillaci and Stojanowski, 2005). Thus, the effects of differential external gene flow can be assessed by comparing observed and expected variances (Relethford and Balngero, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the R-matrix method may give a more accurate representation of population history than classical methods (Komesu et al, 2008). As a result, many researchers, including us, now use this method to elucidate probable human history and to compare variances within and among geographical groups (Relethford, 1991(Relethford, , 1994Relethford and Harpending, 1994;Powell and Neves, 1999;Steadman, 2001;González-José et al, 2003;Roseman and Weaver, 2004;Stojanowski, 2004Stojanowski, , 2005Hanihara and Ishida, 2005;Schillaci and Stojanowski, 2005;Komesu et al, 2008;Hanihara, 2008;Hanihara et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%