2014
DOI: 10.2319/101513-764.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial features of patients with sickle cell anemia and sickle cell trait

Abstract: Objective: To identify the craniofacial characteristics of patients with sickle cell trait (SCT) and sickle cell anemia (SCA) and to compare these measurements with those of nonaffected subjects. Materials and Methods: Clinically normal patients and those with SCT and SCA were evaluated in this study. The patients were divided into three groups: normal (control), SCA, and SCT (n 5 with 15 in each group). Inclusion criteria were SCA or SCT verified by laboratory methods and no treatment with fixed orthodontics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher ANB angle is associated with maxillary projection among SCD patients. This corroborates with the results of Pithon et al .,[23] who observed increased ANB angle in SCD patients. Collectively, this suggests that in SCD patients, there is a tendency toward Class II malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Higher ANB angle is associated with maxillary projection among SCD patients. This corroborates with the results of Pithon et al .,[23] who observed increased ANB angle in SCD patients. Collectively, this suggests that in SCD patients, there is a tendency toward Class II malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The SCT group had a similar but statistically different pattern. Pithon et al 10 obtained similar findings for the maxillary prognathism and mandibular setback between the SCA and SCT patients, when compared to the control group. This finding is in line with the study conducted by Licciardello, Bertuna, Samperi, 23 which assessed the craniofacial morphology of 36 patients with sickle cell disease and 36 volunteers without the disease, aged 18.5–51 years, in which the upper incisors were significantly more buccally positioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The evaluation of the differences in shape and size among SCA and SCT patients and unaffected individuals allowed for the establishment of distinctions among, and the characterization of, the groups. A study undertaken by Pithon et al, 10 with the aim of categorizing the same groups using traditional morphometrics, demonstrated no significant differences between unaffected individuals and SCT patients or between unaffected individuals and SCA patients, also showing that the SCA and SCT patients exhibited the class II skeletal pattern due to the mandibular setback. Moreover, maxillary expansion was not detected by traditional morphometrics, which is at odds with the geometric morphometrics findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent studies assessed the craniofacial and occlusal features in children and adolescents with SCD [60]- [66]. Increased maxillary overjet [38], [60], [62], [64]- [66], increased overbite [38], [65], higher prevalence of openbite [60], [62], [66], greater posterior crossbite [66], burdened incisal segment crowding [66], maxillary misalignment in the anterior segment [62], [66], significant retruded mandible [60], higher prevalence of Class II molar relation [60], [62], [64], [65] and of maxillary protrusion [65]- [67] have been reported in children and adolescents with SCD than in healthy controls. As per the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), children and adolescents with SCD were found to have severe, handicapping malocclusion with compulsory treatment needs [60], [62], [66].…”
Section: F Malocclusion-facial Overgrowthmentioning
confidence: 99%