2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
18
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result supports the findings of Gautam et al that the maxillary structures were displaced laterally with the different types of headgear retractions [17]. All lateral displacements in the anterior region were found to be more than 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result supports the findings of Gautam et al that the maxillary structures were displaced laterally with the different types of headgear retractions [17]. All lateral displacements in the anterior region were found to be more than 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies examining maxillary displacement with FEA are also limited and generally concentrated on rapid palatal expansion (RPE) [1316]. Other than RPE studies, one study evaluated the maxillary displacement under different headgear forces and another under protraction forces [17,18]. The present study is the first FEA that addresses the displacement pattern of the maxillary segment during TMS surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical force across sutures is known to modulate bone remodeling and formation (Gautam et al, 2009). In clinical orthodontics, midpalatal suture expansion is an effective treatment to correct transverse maxillary deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous studies in the literature using cephalometric (20, 21) and finite element modeling (22), suggesting that variations in HG biomechanics may lead to different craniofacial changes. Also, there is one report on 200 consecutively treated patients, showing that cephalometric changes related to HG biomechanics are quite variable and statistically non‐significant (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%