2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniocervical Posture Assessed With Photogrammetry and the Accuracy of Palpation Methods for Locating the Seventh Cervical Spinous Process: A Cross-sectional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Photogrammetry studies have verified that different methods of locating the spinous process of C7 produce highly similar results, with differences smaller than the margin of error of the tests themselves. 61 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photogrammetry studies have verified that different methods of locating the spinous process of C7 produce highly similar results, with differences smaller than the margin of error of the tests themselves. 61 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examiner took a photo of the body in profile after 5 s of stopping. Finally, the desired photo was transferred to the computer, and using AutoCAD software, the angle of the line connecting the tragus and the seventh cervical vertebra with the vertical line (forward head angle) and the angle of the line connecting the same vertebra and the acromion process with the vertical line (forward shoulder angle) was measured [16]. The range of motion of flexion, extension, abduction, and internal and external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction was measured using a Robinson 3 goniometer from Australia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Та же группа ученых исследовала чувствительность и специфичность фотограмметрии при изучении торсии туловища, а чувстви-тельность и специфичность метода подтверждались с использованием сколиометра. Несмотря на относительно высокие результаты оценки (чувствительность и специфичность фотограмметрического метода при оценке торсии была выше 83 и 78 % соответственно) [27], недостатком проведенного исследования может служить относительная неточность, связанная с тем, что предметом изучения стал реберный гиббус, который в большей степени связан с деформацией грудной клетки, чем с торсией позвоночника [28] (рис. 8).…”
Section: обсуждение результатовunclassified