“…For abbreviations, see Material and Methods. and Norell, 2000) in having proportionally more gracile jaw, proportionally longer and narrower frontals and parietals, and absence of parietal foramen; resembles the Late Cretaceous Carusia intermedia (Borsuk-Białynicka, 1985) and Exostinus serratus (Bhullar, 2010) in having frontals that are anteriorly narrow and posteriorly broad, with strong sub-olfactory processes, in the strong concavity of the maxillary narial margin, and, for Carusia but not Exostinus, in the shape of the dentary coronoid process, but Kuroyuriella differs from both in that the frontals are paired rather than fused and lack coarse tubercular sculpture, there is no sculpture on the maxilla, the parietal is of a different morphology (square and largely excluded from the upper temporal fenestra by postorbitofrontal facets, no parietal foramen) and sculpture pattern (low relief rather than coarse and tubercular); resembles Late Cretaceous genera Parmeosaurus scutatus and Hymenosaurus clarki (Gao and Norell, 2000) in gracile dentary with straight long axis, but differs from former in having uni-rather than tricuspid teeth, free posterior edge on dentary coronoid process, greater orbital emargination of frontals, FIGURE 4. Kuroyuriella mikikoi gen. et sp.…”