2006
DOI: 10.1080/03115510608619584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial morphology of the Miocene thylacinid Mutpuracinus archibaldi (Thylacinidae, Marsupialia) and relationships within the Dasyuromorphia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() argued that evidence for open forest environments based on late Oligocene mammal assemblages in northeastern Australia might explain the apparent dearth of thylacinids as a characteristic element of early–middle Miocene rainforest faunas. This under‐representation of xeric/arid palaeocommunities, in conjunction with ambiguous character state interpretations (see Murray & Megirian, ), could likewise account for the absence of abundant Miocene dasyurids, which perhaps proliferated in the more erosional Mallee‐like scrublands evinced for central Australia from the middle Miocene (Metzger, ; Metzger & Retallack, ). Certainly, similar ‘environmentally biased’ Neogene distributions have been mooted for other Australian marsupials including peramelemorphians (Westerman et al ., ), macropodiforms (Meredith et al ., ), and pseudocheirid possums (Meredith et al ., ), as well as for reptile, amphibian, and bird groups including Australian diplodactylid geckos (Oliver et al ., ), sphenomorphid skinks (Skinner, Hutchinson & Lee, ), snapping turtles (Todd et al ., ), Australian toadlets (Catullo & Keogh, ), and birds (Toon et al ., ; Joseph et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…() argued that evidence for open forest environments based on late Oligocene mammal assemblages in northeastern Australia might explain the apparent dearth of thylacinids as a characteristic element of early–middle Miocene rainforest faunas. This under‐representation of xeric/arid palaeocommunities, in conjunction with ambiguous character state interpretations (see Murray & Megirian, ), could likewise account for the absence of abundant Miocene dasyurids, which perhaps proliferated in the more erosional Mallee‐like scrublands evinced for central Australia from the middle Miocene (Metzger, ; Metzger & Retallack, ). Certainly, similar ‘environmentally biased’ Neogene distributions have been mooted for other Australian marsupials including peramelemorphians (Westerman et al ., ), macropodiforms (Meredith et al ., ), and pseudocheirid possums (Meredith et al ., ), as well as for reptile, amphibian, and bird groups including Australian diplodactylid geckos (Oliver et al ., ), sphenomorphid skinks (Skinner, Hutchinson & Lee, ), snapping turtles (Todd et al ., ), Australian toadlets (Catullo & Keogh, ), and birds (Toon et al ., ; Joseph et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wroe & Musser () recognized the genus Antechinus (Phascogalini) as sister to Sminthopsis (Sminthopsini) and placed Neophascogale (Dasyurini) with phascogalins ( Murexia and Phascogale ). By contrast, Murray & Megirian () resolved Neophascogale with Dasyurus + Sarcophilus but found that the plesiomorphic thylacinid Mutpuracinus archibaldi could be returned as a dasyurid. Conversely, Van Dyck () nested Phascogale within Antechinus and derived a polytomy incorporating Planigalini, Dasyurinae, and Sminthopsinae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations