2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
72
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
72
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cranial inferior facet damage can potentially contribute to adjacent segment degeneration [27]. Percutaneous pedicle screws violate the cranial facet joint more often than traditional instrumented screws [28]. Our incidence of violation of the cranial facet joint was 49%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranial inferior facet damage can potentially contribute to adjacent segment degeneration [27]. Percutaneous pedicle screws violate the cranial facet joint more often than traditional instrumented screws [28]. Our incidence of violation of the cranial facet joint was 49%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considerably higher X-ray exposure as well as significantly increased rates of adjacent level facet joint violations have been recorded, even for experienced MIS surgeons [3,[11][12][13]59]. Thus, future studies need to evaluate the effectiveness of these ''minimally invasive'' techniques as well as their mid-and long-term effect on adjacent level degenerative pathologies.…”
Section: Posterior Fusion Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of fusion procedures are performed via posterior approaches, with or without instrumentation, with or without additional interbody fusion techniques such as PLIF/TLIF or 360°fusions with additional anterior ALIF support [1,2]. However, a variety of negative side effects have been linked with the fusion of lumbar motion segments, including graft side morbidity, screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, sagittal imbalance, high rates of adjacent level pathologies, considerable complication and reoperation rates as well as mediocre clinical results [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Posterior Fusion Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusion of lumbar motion segments performed for the treatment of intractable low back pain (LBP) from degenerative disc disease (DDD) without any deformities or instabilities are associated with a variety of negative side effects, including adjacent level pathologies, considerable complication and reoperation rates, symptomatic facet and sacroiliac joint complaints, cranial facet joint violations, adjacent segment stenosis, negatively altered sagittal alignment, pseudarthrosis, graft site morbidity, and others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%