2001
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200109150-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial Compression by Reverse Distraction: A New Technique for Correction of Sagittal Synostosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its limitations, the cranial index provides a gross assessment of dimensional change, and our results compare very favorably with other reported series 15,16,18,21,22,27 (Table 1), with an average in- Fig. 8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its limitations, the cranial index provides a gross assessment of dimensional change, and our results compare very favorably with other reported series 15,16,18,21,22,27 (Table 1), with an average in- Fig. 8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Where other centers have focused on measuring cranial index changes 15,16,18,21,22 in the reporting of results, a normal cranial index alone does not necessarily reflect a normal head shape, and stigmata of the deformity will remain apparent if excessive frontal bossing, occipital "bulleting," and the anteriorly located vertex persist. Despite its limitations, the cranial index provides a gross assessment of dimensional change, and our results compare very favorably with other reported series 15,16,18,21,22,27 (Table 1), with an average in- Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In scaphocephaly cases, distraction osteogenesis has been used to laterally expand the temporoparietal bone [25]. Greensmith et al [4] treated 3 scaphocephaly patients with gradual cranial compression with a distractor in the anteroposterior length. Matsumoto et al [5] treated a case of scaphocephaly by both increasing the skull width with a distraction device and decreasing the anteroposterior length with a contraction device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these problems, gradual cranial compression via a distractor has been introduced for the correction of the various manifestations of craniosynostosis. Greensmith et al [4] have reported some promising outcomes for cranial compression with a distractor to correct sagittal craniosynostosis. Matsumoto et al [5] and Komuro et al [6] have reported the efficacy of a modified technique involving simultaneous distraction and contraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%