2019
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial burr holes in the emergency department: to drill or not to drill?

Abstract: The practice of trepanning (referred to today as a craniotomy) dates back to the Neolithic period. Reasons for drilling a hole through the skull evolved from releasing evil spirits and curing insanity to practical management of head injuries in ancient Greece and Rome. Today, craniotomy or drilling a burr hole through the skull is very much the purview of the neurosurgeon. Yet one could argue that the procedure itself is more ‘bone surgery’ than ‘brain surgery’. Nevertheless, despite the fact that head injury … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure has been successfully performed by non-neurosurgeons in the ED in USA [3] and ICU in UK [4] . Good neurological outcome has also been reported from Burr Hole drainage of EDH performed in ED at a remote location [5] . Under similar time pressures in a rural ED in USA, even subdural haematomas have been drained by IO needle [6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The procedure has been successfully performed by non-neurosurgeons in the ED in USA [3] and ICU in UK [4] . Good neurological outcome has also been reported from Burr Hole drainage of EDH performed in ED at a remote location [5] . Under similar time pressures in a rural ED in USA, even subdural haematomas have been drained by IO needle [6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This EMJ case study3 is a perfect illustration that emergency craniostomy can be safely and effectively delivered by properly equipped and trained non-surgeon physicians (Emergency Medicine consultants) under circumstances that would otherwise result in a dismal outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%