1993
DOI: 10.21236/ada278799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cramer-Von Mises Variance Estimators for Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Popular choices of weighting functions are (Schruben 1983) f 2 t = √ 840 3t 2 − 3t + 1/2 (Goldsman et al 1990), and f cos j t = √ 8 j cos 2 jt with j = 1 2 (Foley and Goldsman 1999), Foley and Goldsman (1999) show that we can average the first k area estimators arising from the weighting functions f cos j · j = 1 2 to obtain estimators for 2 with more degrees of freedom, The weighted CvM estimator computed exclusively from batch i is defined as follows: C i g m ≡ 1/m m k=1 g k/m 2 T 2 i m k/m for i = 1 b where g · is a normalized weighting function on 0 1 for which 1 0 g t t 1 − t dt = 1 and whose second derivative d 2 /dt 2 g t is continuous on 0 1 . The batched CvM estimator for 2 is Goldsman et al (1999). Popular choices of weighting functions are g 0 t = 6 g 2 t = −24+150t −150t 2 and Glynn and Whitt (1991); Schmeiser (1982); and Steiger and Wilson (2001).…”
Section: Nonoverlapping Batched Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular choices of weighting functions are (Schruben 1983) f 2 t = √ 840 3t 2 − 3t + 1/2 (Goldsman et al 1990), and f cos j t = √ 8 j cos 2 jt with j = 1 2 (Foley and Goldsman 1999), Foley and Goldsman (1999) show that we can average the first k area estimators arising from the weighting functions f cos j · j = 1 2 to obtain estimators for 2 with more degrees of freedom, The weighted CvM estimator computed exclusively from batch i is defined as follows: C i g m ≡ 1/m m k=1 g k/m 2 T 2 i m k/m for i = 1 b where g · is a normalized weighting function on 0 1 for which 1 0 g t t 1 − t dt = 1 and whose second derivative d 2 /dt 2 g t is continuous on 0 1 . The batched CvM estimator for 2 is Goldsman et al (1999). Popular choices of weighting functions are g 0 t = 6 g 2 t = −24+150t −150t 2 and Glynn and Whitt (1991); Schmeiser (1982); and Steiger and Wilson (2001).…”
Section: Nonoverlapping Batched Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting question to investigate is that of using other, non-χ 2 variance estimators in the Rinott procedure. For example, the low variance and reasonable convergence properties of the overlapping batch means estimator (Meketon and Schmeiser 1984) or the STS Cramér-von Mises estimator (Goldsman, Kang, and Seila 1999) might make them attractive candidates for inclusion in Rinott.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimator C 1 (g 0 ; n) has the same asymptotic variance as, but significantly larger bias than, the original level-0 CvM estimator C 0 (g 0 ; n), whose bias is about 5γ 1 /n (Example 3). Using Lagrange multipliers as in Goldsman et al [1999], we can find the polynomial weight function g(t) that minimizes the limiting variance Var[C 1 (g)] of the level-1 folded CvM estimator for σ 2 while satisfying the first-order unbiasedness constraint (G +¯Ḡ = 1) and Assumptions G. For example, the asymptotically minimum-variance, first-order unbiased, level-1 quadratic weight is g 1,2 (t) ≡ −180t 2 + 168t − 24, resulting in a limiting variance of Var[C 1 (g 1,2 )] = 72σ 4 /35 . = 2.057σ 4 -a bit larger than that of the analogous level-0 quadratically weighted CvM estimator, which equals 1.729σ 4 (Example 3).…”
Section: The Folded Cvm Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%